Conservative internationalism.
Sempa, Francis P.
Conservative Internationalism
http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/26105009.html
By Henry R. Nau, Professor of International Affairs, George
Washington University
Reviewed by Francis P. Sempa, Contributing Editor
In the August-September issue of the Hoover Institution's
Policy Review, Henry R. Nau, a professor at George Washington
University's Elliott School of International Affairs who served in
the Ford and Reagan administrations, has written a lengthy and
fascinating article identifying the principal tenets and analyzing the
historical foundations of an approach to foreign policy he calls
"conservative internationalism."
Nau identifies key tenets of "conservative
internationalism," and traces the historical and intellectual
foundations of this approach to the presidencies of Jefferson, Polk,
Truman, and Reagan. He also explains how "conservative
internationalism" differs in some ways and is similar in other ways
to "realism" as exemplified by Alexander Hamilton and Theodore
Roosevelt, and "liberal internationalism" as practiced by
Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.
The 11 tenets of "conservative internationalism" are:
(1) Expanding freedom by increasing the world's number of
democratic, constitutional governments;
(2) Focusing initially on geopolitical, not ideological threats;
(3) Seeking opportunities to fashion a balance of power that
expands freedom;
(4) Exercising prudence in picking targets for the expansion of
freedom;
(5) Consistently combining force with diplomacy to achieve foreign
policy goals;
(6) Giving equal weight to force and diplomacy, and timing
diplomatic initiatives to coincide with effective military strength;
(7) Relying less on international institutions and being less
concerned with constructing a "world community;"
(8) Recognizing that expanding democracy is difficult and
significantly constrained by culture and other local factors;
(9) Promoting expansion of free trade that encourages (but does not
guarantee) political freedom abroad;
(10) Factoring culture, ideology, and religion, along with
economics, into selecting targets for expanding freedom; and
(11) Accepting that in free societies foreign policy must receive
public support to achieve ultimate success.
Nau provides historical examples of "conservative
internationalism" at work:
* Jefferson's confronting the Barbary pirates, skillfully
negotiating the Louisiana Purchase, and preparing for war by the embargo
against Britain;
* Polk's use of diplomacy and force to annex Texas and expand
the reach of American power to the west and southwest of the continent;
* Truman's extension of the U.S. blanket of freedom to Greece,
Turkey, and Western Europe via the Truman Doctrine, the Berlin airlift,
the Marshall Plan, and NATO; and
* Reagan's victory in the Cold War, which brought freedom to
Eastern Europe with relatively little bloodshed.
Finally, Nau applies "conservative internationalism" to
today's foreign policy debate, and concludes that this approach
provides a "more realistic assessment" of the threat posed by
Islamic terrorism, "a more achievable agenda to spread
democracy," a more useful model of marrying force to diplomacy to
achieve foreign policy goals, and a tradition of prudence and patience
in accomplishing those goals.
"In both Iraq and Afghanistan," counsels Nau, "U.S.
foreign policy needs more patience." Democracy will not be achieved
soon or with perfection. Our policies must adapt to local conditions and
circumstances. Islamic moderates must be encouraged and supported
throughout the region. Force and diplomacy must work hand-in-hand to
achieve the security and stability without which democracy and freedom
cannot grow and flourish. "This is the way the long battle for the
moderate soul of Islam will be waged and won."