What Students Need to Know About the Vietnam War.
Bullington, J.R.
What Students Need to Know About the Vietnam War
By Ronald Spector
Reviewed by J. R. Bullington, Editor
Text: www.fpri.org/footnotes/1414.200905.spector.vietnamwar.html
The Wachman Center, an affiliate of the Foreign Policy Research
Institute, sponsored the two-part "History Institute for Teachers
on What Students Need to Know About America's Wars," in which
distinguished historians lectured and provided concise information to
help high school history teachers explain to their students the
fundamental things they should know about America's wars, from the
Revolution to today's war on terrorism. (For videofiles, texts of
lectures, and classroom lessons, see:
www.fpri.org/education/americaswars1/ and
www.fpri.org/education/americaswars2/.
I've read most of the lectures, and I found them consistently
interesting and well-balanced, bringing the latest historical research
and analysis to a contemporary audience. Anyone who enjoys reading good
history should find them worthwhile, and they will surely upgrade and
enliven history classes across the land.
This lecture on the Vietnam War, by Ronald Spector, a professor of
history and international affairs at George Washington University and
Marine Corps Vietnam veteran, was especially interesting for me as a
participant in that war (when I was a young Foreign Service Officer) and
as someone who has been dismayed by how it is usually taught and written
about by academics.
Prof. Spector's approach is non-polemic and balanced, and he
identifies--correctly, in my view--the key elements of the war, with
particular emphasis on the air war in North Vietnam and pacification (counterinsurgency operations) in the South. He also describes
accurately the "GI experience," which is likely to be the most
interesting part of the war for today's high school students, many
of whom have heard stories about it from parents, grandparents, and
other participants. His brief account of the war may be about as much as
can be fit into a high school survey course.
I'm concerned, however, that there is nothing here to explain
the war's context, deeply rooted in the Cold War, and its
background in Vietnamese history. Without some comprehension of both,
it's impossible to understand the war's origins or the reasons
for America's involvement. A more comprehensive--and in my view
more correct--account can be found in books such as Lewis Sorley's
A Better War and Rufus Phillips' Why Vietnam Matters. (The latter
is reviewed in American Diplomacy at:
www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/item/2009/0406/book/book_bullington_vietnam.html.) Nonetheless, Prof. Spector gives teachers a much better picture of
the Vietnam War than most of them are likely to have learned in college.
While the Iraq War has been highly divisive for Americans,
it's easy to forget that the Vietnam War was even more divisive,
and left fractures in our body politic that are yet to heal. In teaching
the coming generations about it, it's important to get the facts
right and present a fair, well-reasoned perspective.