Thomas, Pradip Ninan and Elske van de Fliert. Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change: The Basis For a Renewal.
Crandall, Heather
Thomas, Pradip Ninan and Elske van de Fliert. Interrogating the
Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change: The Basis For a
Renewal. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2105. Pp. 150. ISBN
978-1-137-42630-7 (cloth) $100; 978-1-137-42631-4 (e-book) $79.99.
Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social
Change: The Basis For a Renewal begins with a compelling preface. It is
the first book in Palgrave's series on communication for social
change (CSC), so it has a big job of laying out the problem--that the
field of CSC has lost its way. One reason is the institutionalization
and corporatization of CSC. As a case in point, the term CSC has been
trademarked, a point of contention that shows the extent to which
top-down CSC approaches now dominate, and bottom-up approaches to CSC
are marginalized. The whole enterprise suffers. CSC is tightly bound
with development communication, and in recent years, the nature of the
discourse has shifted. Terms such as empowerment and participation have
been co-opted and gutted of their emancipatory meaning in the service of
a neoliberal agenda. Further, the corporatized use of the term
participation obscures the workings of power. While Interrogating
clearly outlines the misdirected path the field of CSC traveled to
arrive in this place, a place both ubiquitous and impotent, it does
something unusual to critiques--it offers a way out. Solutions
demonstrates hope and commitment to the power and promise of CSC.
Interrogating is wellwritten and thought provoking. It clarifies the
problems with current CSC practices, theory, and scholarship and
accounts for their rise and invisibility. Therefore, Interrogating is
worthwhile reading for CSC or C4D (Communication for Development)
scholars, teachers, and practitioners.
A follow-the-money chapter outlines the financial and political
agenda of the neoliberal project to globally promote democracy and
"soft diplomacy" through CSC. Often a follow-the-money chapter
trails off in an emotional rant. Thomas and Fliert do not. They craft
clear summary points from the evidence presented. They ask that CSC
thinkers understand "it is important that we not underestimate the
geo-political motivations behind aid in media development" (p. 75).
In a chapter on the role of technologies in social change, Thomas
and Fliert outline the three broad solutions that have been explored in
global development projects. These are information stations such as
telekiosks and telecenters, hardware solutions, and connectivity
solutions such as mobile phones. Thomas and Fliert describe the key
assumptions of technology for social change and the problems with each.
The assumptions are flawed because they are based on "partial
truths" (p. 99). Also, the information resources ebb and flow based
on funding priorities and usually end up replicating existing cultural
contexts so that the marginalized do not share the resource equally.
The set of solutions offered in Interrogating includes the need to
shift from thinking about communication as a tool, which they point out
convincingly carries a pre-set agenda, to thinking about communication
as a process for listening, sharing, and building mutual understandings
of local problems and workable solutions. Along with a shift in the way
communication is commonly conceptualized, transdisciplinarity is needed.
"Transdisciplinarity, as we advocate for it here, strives for
shared understanding by all stakeholders of the implications of each
relevant disciplinary perspective that relates to the issue at hand in
each of the other disciplines" (p. 121). This approach, then, paves
the way for effective implementation. To be effective, a CSC strategy
has to stick to the basic principles of dialogue, advocacy,
participation, and purpose across all phases of a mutually discovered
and holistically understood plan. This in no way resembles what is
currently in practice. Each component of their solutions and framework
is detailed and the built-in flexibility highlighted.
Interrogating ends in a focus on the importance of humans as
communicative beings, who rely on language, to be in relationship. It
highlights the importance of voice to social change, to true democratic
practices such as two-way communication, and to power sharing. The
authors take up the Right to Communication movement along with an
inspiring list of CSC efforts that are going well. "Communication
rights enable people to have their Voices heard and be involved in the
shaping of development through processes of their choice" (p. 137).
Interrogating calls for a renewal. It asks that the prevailing social
change work that doesn't lead to real change be replaced with the
social change work that does.
For CSC practitioners, Interrogating is useful. First, it is useful
through its argument for transdisciplinarity and its high level look at
the trends in the field. Second, it is useful through the practical
examples and existing resources available. For example, The United
Kingdom's International Institute for Environment and Development
has a treasure trove of practical guidelines available to use along with
a Participatory Learning Action Plan series. Thomas and Fliert do
caution that methods are only as good as their implementation.
Practitioners could profit from learning that UNICEF is the only global
organization with a useful network of specialists in communication for
development (C4D), although this network is not without significant
problems. Practitioners interested in the use of technology for social
change could study the Bhoomi project. Based in India, the project was a
massive effort to digitize land records. Practitioners tired of a
one-size-fits-all model that does not make substantial difference should
find the model Interrogating offers exciting.
For those who teach undergraduate courses with sections on media
and globalization or communication for social change, Interrogating has
great case studies. One case, for example, the Alliance of Youth
Movement, is detailed. The authors then describe how to critically see
it. They say the movement is really about "influencing everyday
cultures of mainly middle-class youth through the world who are united
by their use of social networking technologies to generate and share
content but who have now been enlisted to work towards a greater
cause--that of bringing 'democracy' along with presumably the
'market' to their countries" (pp. 63-64). A generative
class discussion could follow.
For those who teach graduate-level seminars on communication for
social change, political economy, development communication, or global
media systems, Thomas and Fliert make clear the connection of how theory
informs practice. For example, diffusion of innovations theory has
served to guide CSC for decades. Interrogating traces how power
functions in a Foulcaudian perspective, how hegemony is maintained by
the powerful, and how the two-step flow highlights the importance of
opinion leaders as a key concept in development. The authors also
discuss many of the newer ideas about problems with technological
determinism. They point out that, as is often the case, projects do not
carefully conceptualize or implement technology, so problems occur when
technology does not deliver in local contexts, contexts rife with race,
class, and gender divides. One example that illustrates the failure to
examine technology in a specific context can be seen in the effort to
provide texting options to the Dalit (untouchables) in South India.
Texting did not allow for the expected "obedient
conversations" between the Dalit and the upper-caste members and
was therefore unsuccessful.
What is useful for teachers will also help scholars. Specifically
Interrogating offers recent lists of scholarship in each chapter. In the
chapter on agencies and structures, Thomas and Fliert point to "the
most comprehensive overview of the literature on International Media
Development Cooperation" (p. 80). In the chapter on communication,
power, and social change, they argue that the organizations involved in
social change are worthwhile objects of study if you consider both power
as a resource and power as a strategy (p. 71). The chapter on theory
describes that "any given theory of communication and social change
is based on five levels" and argues for the need for more
theorizing of each as well as a general enlarging of the field of
enquiry. One way to do this is to include political economy. The authors
consistently point to fruitful areas of research or theorizing. They
assert that CSC work under theorizes the digital and, similarly,
theorizing about power is both needed and lacking. Interrogating shows
that "the most important recent contributions have congealed around
visual and ethnographic methodologies" (p. 17).
The writing is sometimes humorous. For example, in describing the
efforts of the UN to improve coordination for development programs,
Thomas and Fliert write, "Couched in extremely bland UN-speak, the
language is consistently vague and reflects perfectly the ad hoc nature
of thinking through C4D in UN circles" (p. 108). And in describing
the World Congress on Communication for Development (WCCD), Thomas and
Fliert say the "Congress turned out to be a talk-fest" (p.
111).
However Interrogating does not discuss the movement underway with
some organizations that refuse money for fear of the ideological and
political pressures that accompany funding. The idea emerges implicitly
in the long list of ways CSC projects serve as vehicles for neoliberal
values, the free market, and democracy.
McPhail's (2009) book, Development Communication: Reframing
the Role of the Media, which was written in part by McPhail, and in part
by selected experts, has some areas of overlap with Interrogating and
some differences. Both books share the assumption that something is
wrong with the current state of CSC. McPhail sees a moment of change and
aims to move the field forward in productive directions by arguing for
interdisciplinary, or at least more inclusive, approaches to development
communication. McPhail's book does not see easy solutions and calls
for a rethinking of development communication's theoretical
orientations because simplistic perspectives will not result in change.
Interrogating does see a clear set of solutions and details them (see
above) in line with McPhail's desired direction that are
interdisciplinary, holistic, inclusive, localized, and in McPhail's
case, feminist.
Both books cover the systems of agencies, task forces, commissions,
and funding sources involved in development communication efforts. Both
books cover the role of media and technology in CSC work. Both books
offer useful cases to consider. One could offer either book to students
and use the other as a companion or set of selections. In terms of
scholarship, both together make a solid foundation for a need for change
and a productive way forward.
Reference
McPhail, T. L. (Ed.). (2009). Development communication: Reframing
the role of the media Chichester, UK and Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell.
Heather Crandall
Gonzaga University