Conservation and rebinding of the Bligh notebook.
Engram, Chesley
The notebook of William Bligh (MS5393) and the List of Mutineers
http://nationaltreasures.nla.gov.au/index/Treasures/item/nla.ms-ms5393-1-s13 have now been digitised as part of their inclusion in the
exhibition National Treasures from Australia's Great Libraries.
The notebook and the list are Bligh's records of the famous
mutiny by members of the crew of the HMS Bounty on 28 April 1789.
Led by the captain's second-in-command, Fletcher Christian,
the mutiny was in apparent reaction to hostility to the captain, the
privations of the long voyage, and reluctance to leave the haven of
Tahiti . The ship's commander, Captain William Bligh, and 18 crew
who refused to join in the mutiny were set adrift with very little food
or water in the ship's long boat. For 47 harrowing days they
travelled in an open launch that was just 23 feet long, finally reaching
Timor on 14 June after a journey of some 3500 miles.
Bligh detailed their voyage in a notebook appropriated from
midshipman Thomas Hayward. The entries consist of navigational
recordings, calculations and rough sketch charts of islands. They show
the boat's track through the Barrier Reef and along the coast of
Australia to the Torres Strait, including an autograph chart titled
'Eye sketch of part of New Holland in the Bounty's launch by
Lieut. Wm. Bligh'. There are occasional comments on Bligh's
companions on the boat, and observations about the coastline and weather
conditions. The most historically interesting comment is the list of
mutineers, headed by Fletcher Christian, with each mutineer's
physical appearance described in detail. The leader of the mutiny is
immortalised in Bligh's notes as of 'high dark swarthy complexion ... a little bow-legged ... subject to violent perspiration
& particularly His hands so that he soils anything he handles'.
Bligh guarded the notebook closely ('kept in my bosom')
throughout the voyage and used it in the subsequent case against the
mutineers--ten of whom were ultimately brought to court in England, with
three hanged. He also used it to write up his own official narratives.
The notebook was acquired by the Library in 1976 for 55,000 [pounds
sterling]. At that time it was tightly bound in leather-covered boards
with marbled endpapers. There is wide agreement that this cover was not
the original, largely because the writing often continues into the
gutter of the pages where it is partially covered. Also, the notebook
comprises four sections of differing papers, which could have been bound
together at a later time.
Because the existing binding was very tight and prevented full
opening of the pages, the notebook was disbound in 2005 to allow full
digital copying of the text for the Treasures exhibition. The disbinding
revealed a number of problematic features of the previous binding, such
as the oversewing of the sections. This contributed to the tightness and
deterioration of the volume.
The paper of the pages, though slightly acidic (pH 5.6), is in very
good condition where not physically damaged. Typical damage includes
considerable wear, cockling, creasing and rounding of corners, edge and
spine-fold tears and old repairs. The front section, in particular, was
extensively stained.
It appears that the notebook was written in iron-gall ink. Ongoing
international research into chemical stabilisation of iron-gall ink
documents has raised some questions about the suitability of previously
accepted routine alkaline aqueous treatments (washing in alkaline
water). Because of this, and to maintain the integrity and appearance of
this very important document, it was decided not to perform an aqueous
treatment.
The pages were dry-cleaned with powdered eraser then repairs to
tears and infills of losses were made using colour-matched Japanese
tissue, hand-made western paper and wheat starch paste. To approximate
the weight, density and tone of each loss or repair, composite layers of
both types of coloured papers were used. This part of the project was
completed over an intense three-week period by two conservators, Susanne
Wullen and Sophie Lewincamp, supervised by Kerry McInnis. The pages were
then digitised.
The watermarks of the pages were also examined during the treatment
to ascertain whether the sections were made of one original folded and
cut sheet. This was an exciting opportunity because conservators rarely
get an opportunity to closely examine documents in this way. It was
concluded that the first two sections are from similar types of paper
all displaying parts of a Britannia watermark and that the third and
fourth sections were cut from a sheet of paper bearing the watermark JH
& ZOON.
The three sheets of handmade paper comprising the List of Mutineers
were also treated at this time. Again, a non-aqueous treatment was
performed. Previous tear repairs which were misaligned, discoloured and
obscured the script were removed and replaced and then the pages were
flattened.
A decision was made to rebind the notebook with a new casing in a
style similar to the existing one. The existing cover will be retained
as a separate object and stored with the rebound notebook.
As mentioned, the existing binding was extremely tight and
difficult to open. To alleviate this and to rectify other problems in
the new binding it was decided to sew the text sections on to reversed
V-guard sections. A guard usually consists of a strip of paper pasted
around or into a section to prevent the sewing thread from tearing
through. The reverse V-guard is a folded guard consisting of several
strips of paper to which a section is sewn; the guard is then folded
back on itself causing the fold to meet the section in reverse ( reverse
V-guard ><--section). This style of reverse V-guard binding
distances the binding operations, such as gluing, from the original text
block. It provides a mechanism for the original text block to be easily
and safely removed from the binding and allow future re-covering. The
binding treatments were carried out by conservation binder Neale
Wootton.
The original front and back fly leaves were joined together to form
two separate sections, creating a total of six sections, each of which
was sewn on to a reverse V-guard section. These guard sections were then
stab-sewn together, glued, backed and rounded to create the text block.
Kangaroo-skin covered archival boards and archival hand-made paper
end-leaves were then used to re-case the notebook. The notebook is now
able to be opened more easily without putting any pressure on the text
pages.
Preservation Services staff obtained a great deal of satisfaction
and pleasure from this opportunity to employ their professional
expertise on such an invaluable manuscript. The notebook is now in a
condition to be viewed by exhibition visitors and accessed by Library
patrons for many years to come.
Chesley Engram
Preservation Services