History and Memory in the Two Souths: Recent Southern and Spanish American Fiction. (Book Reviews).
Donaldson, Susan V.
History and Memory in the Two Souths: Recent Southern and Spanish
American Fiction, by Deborah N. Cohn. Nashville: Vanderbilt University
Press, 1999. x, 248 pp. $39.95 cloth. $19.95 paper.
CARLOS FUENTOS ONCE WROTE THAT William Faulkner loomed so large in
twentieth-century Spanish American literature because "only
Faulkner ... in a closed world of optimism and success, offers us an
image that is common to both the United States and Latin America; the
image of defeat, of separation, of doubt: of tragedy." Building on
similar pronouncements made by Spanish American writers including
Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Mario Vargas Llosa, and Juan Rulfo, Deborah N.
Cohn demonstrates in this study the rich possibilities for "a new
branch of inter-American literary criticism" by tracing
"commonalities" in historical experience, regional identity,
narrative experimentation, and representations of history and memory in
selected U.S. Southern and Spanish American writers. The result does
indeed point toward new directions in comparative Southern cultural and
literary, studies and offers a host of valuable reminders that the
American South is as much a part of the culture of the greater Caribbean
basin as it is a region of the North American continent.
Part of the ongoing redefinition of the literature of the Americas,
Cohn's study draws from earlier studies linking Faulkner with
Garica Marquez in particular and with scholarly approaches developed by
James Irby, Lois Parkinson Zamora, and Jose David Saldivar. But Cohn is
far less interested in writing another study of literary influence than
she is in forming a framework for "inter-American literary
studies" focusing, in her own words, on "convergences, similar
features and strategies that have developed as responses to analogous
sociopolitical and historical circumstances." For Cohn, C. Vann
Woodward's famous argument about the "burden of Southern
history still rings true--that the American South shares with other
cultures of the world experiences atypical for the American
mainstream--that "of dispossession, of socioeconomic hardship, of
political and cultural conflict, and of the export of resources to
support the development of a `North.'" Indeed, Cohn argues
that for both the American South and for Spanish America the plantation
historically has served as a paradigm for socio-economic organization
and as a lingering legacy of hierarchy, racism, patriarchy, and
oppression, and that paradigm in turn has shaped the narrative responses
of writers in both Souths who sought to define their local realities and
cultural identities within literature.
Cohn excavates the "commonalities" of those narrative
responses with a good deal of dexterity and sensitivity, and it is in
the specific parallels/readings she offers linking selected literary
texts--Faulkner's Absalom, Absalom! and Mario Vargas Llosa's
The Real Life of Alejandro Mayta, Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man and
Isabel Allende's The House of the Spirits, Katherine Anne
Porter's Miranda stories and Juan Rulfo's Pedro Paramo--that
her study unearths its greatest riches. Linking Faulkner and Vargas
Llosa reveals not just Faulkner's long shadow on Latin American
letters but the writers' common concerns with the fabrication of
history and the elusiveness of historical truth. Pairing Allende and
Ellison underscores what Cohn calls the "doubly marginalized
perspectives of groups in peripheral regions that have been further
disenfranchised by race and gender." Reading Porter and Rulfo
together demonstrates the ideological uses of memory and its illusory,
creations of lost plenitude in communities struggling to maintain
identity. Above all, though, these pairings remind us that
preoccupations with the construction of history, with oppression and
subversion, and with the temptations of memory are hardly the sole
possession of U.S. Southern literature--what we might call the exception
to American exceptionalism--but rather significant bonds linking the
American South with Spanish America, They are preoccupations that span
cultural and linguistic boundaries and ultimately render those
boundaries highly problematic--no small accomplishment when one
considers how much questions about boundaries--like where and when the
South begins and ends--have traditionally figured into debates,
theories, definitions, and even the very language we use when we
"tell about the South."
Those old debates and definitions die hard, though, and Cohn very
nearly allows them to take over her discussion early on due to her heavy
reliance on implicitly white definitions of Southern culture, identity,
and literature developed by Allen Tate, Frank Owsley, and even Woodward
to a certain extent, whose paradigm of defeat and failure does not take
into account an African-American perspective of the Civil War experience
as one of victory and liberation. Taking her cue from Owsley and
novelist Caroline Gordon, Cohn argues that "official stories"
of the South in the Civil War and Reconstruction were largely Northern
in origin and that accordingly American Southern writers, like Spanish
American writers, felt compelled to "reclaim their histories by
telling their own stories." The fact of the matter is, though, that
thanks to the Dunning School's interpretation of the Civil War and
Reconstruction the white South's version of that period as one of
conquest and exploitation largely dominated the national imagination,
despite W.E.B. Du Bois' bitter rebuttal in Black Reconstruction,
until the appearance of Kenneth Stampp's The Era of Reconstruction
in 1965.
To her credit, Cohn subtly revises her argument in her last chapter
on race and region, where she briefly discusses intersections between
the American South and Cuba in the Spanish-American War and the
silencing of African-American voices and histories in
"official" stories of the American South. Citing Thadious
Davis's examination of black reappropriations of Southern history
and memory, Cohn observes that increasingly African-American writers are
turning to the South and "its multiple meanings as a cornerstone of
black identity" and that any study of the region requires an
examination of external and internal marginalization. Both Spanish
America and the American South, she concludes, "duplicate their own
subordination in the dispossession by race, ethnicity, gender, and class
that has created `fourth world' populations within their
perimeters." That insight alone points toward exciting new
possibilities for reading and linking the literatures and cultures of
the two Souths, and Cohn makes a considerable contribution to Southern
studies in leading the way.
SUSAN V. DONALDSON
The College of William and Mary