Cemetery and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age.
MANNING, STURT W.
Cemetery and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age. Edited by K.
BRANIGAN. Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology, vol. 1. Sheffield:
SHEFFIELD ACADEMIC PRESS, 1998. Pp. 173, maps, illus. $21.50.
This is a mixed bag, typical of an edited conference volume. It is
obvious that the conference (a round table with sixteen participants of
whom thirteen publish here) was a success, although the "extensive
discussion which followed each paper"--referred to by the editor in
his preface and the purpose of such a meeting--is not included in the
volume for the interest of readers not present at the conference. The
present volume is inevitably neither complete in scope, nor unified in
focus or period. However, it does admirably capture the freshness of
innovative work by a number of younger scholars who one may expect to
become significant figures in the future. Unusually for such a volume,
there are no bad papers, and several good ones; the future of Aegean
prehistory is in safe hands. The title should of course read "some
aspects of...," and there is a lack of the significant introductory
essay by the editor, as is usual for such a volume, which would have
positioned the set of studies, and generally offered di scussion of the
relevant theoretical literature, academic context, and historiography.
As a result, the volume does not offer a general text on its subject,
but rather a set of specialist studies of interest either to Aegean
scholars, or those working elsewhere concerned with some current
approaches to mortuary evidence in the Aegean. An emphasis on
particularist, data-driven, approaches is evident; with some honorable
exceptions, theoretical concerns prevalent in general mortuary
archaeology are largely left to other scholars (outside Aegean
prehistory).
The studies are grouped in three fairly loose divisions. Section
one, "Cemeteries and Social and Political Landscapes,"
contains papers by Keith Branigan and Joanne Murphy. Both deal with the
Mesara tholoi of pre-palatial (third millennium B.C.) south central
Crete, discussing the role of the tombs in the human landscape and in
social practice and ritual. Branigan thus returns to a subject he has
written on repeatedly over almost thirty years. Murphy offers an
analysis of the Mesara tholoi in which she identifies (as others have)
the role of the tombs as markers in the landscape, but, more
interestingly, she also discusses the developing exploitation of
mortuary ritual at the tombs by emergent elites through the pre-palatial
period.
Section two, "Tomb Architecture and Grave Furniture as Social
Statements," contains six diverse studies covering parts of the
third and second millennia B.C. Sofia Voutsaki compares Mycenean-period
tombs in the Argolid and Messenia, and links the material to
contemporary social processes. The study is based on material assembled
in her 1993 doctoral dissertation, and, like a previous study published
in 1995, this leads the reader to hope for a full publication of the
thesis. What is here is too summary. Tristan Carter explores Early
Cycladic objects and influences in the Mesara of Crete, including his
speciality, Melian obsidian, in one of the strongest papers. In
particular, Carter considers the socio-political role of such Cycladica
and influences in social theory terms. Alexios Karytinos examines the
sealstones from tombs of pre-palatial Crete, mainly those from Phourni
(Archanes) and the Mesara. He considers these to be, broadly speaking,
prestige goods, but delves little further in a largely descriptive
paper. Christofilis Maggidis, in a strong paper, concentrates on just
one tomb (no. 19) at the remarkable Phourni cemetery and summarizes his
previous detailed doctoral studies on the finds and contextual data. He
argues persuasively that the tomb and the overall Phourni cemetery
provide evidence of developed social stratification shortly before the
advent of the first palaces on Crete, in line with previous studies on
other Early Minoan tombs in the northeast of Crete by Jeffery Soles.
William Cavanagh has previously written several studies on aspects of
Mycenean burial, and offers for this volume some thoughts on both
innovation and conservatism in Mycenean funerary architecture and
grave-goods set in terms of the regularities and differences in ritual
practice across sites. An exciting series of recent papers on
anthropological approaches to eating and drinking in the Aegean,
stemming from a doctoral dissertation of 1995, have brought Yannis
Hamilakis to the attention of the wider Aegean field. Hamilakis'
paper here considers the role of mortuary feasting and the politics of
memory within Minoan society. Although they are not cited, this paper
very much borrows its title and logic from Maurice Bloch's seminal
studies: with eating and digestion a metaphor for death, their
ritualized practice is a form of "gastropolitics." This
approach has wide relevance to Aegean prehistory.
Section three, "Cemetery Populations and Living Society,"
contains three papers. Peter Day, David Wilson, and Evangelia Kiriatzi
examine the ceramics at the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Ayia Photia on
the northeast coast of Crete. This important cemetery was excavated
almost three decades ago, and despite immediate recognition of the
striking Early Cycladie component and the questions raised concerning
immigrants, ethnicity, etc., has remained largely unpublished. Some 252
graves were excavated out of an estimated original three hundred, and
some eighteen hundred ceramic vessels recovered. Almost by definition,
this paper is therefore of considerable significance to Aegean EBA studies. The authors examine the material in order to consider what
Cycladic-style ceramics tell us about the burying population and the
wider demography of EBA Crete. Based on typological and fabric analyses,
they argue that the Cycladic-style elements--the majority of the
ceramics--are in fact from a Cycladic source, as well as produ ction
tradition. Thus, the cemetery is full of imported objects from one or
more remote specialist production sites. The authors go on usefully to
explore issues of both ethnicity and exotica in early societies, and
conclude with a vision of a new structural basis for earlier EBA
interaction and power in the southern Aegean. The following paper by
Sevi Triantaphyllou reviews skeletal material from four prehistoric
sites in Macedonia in terms of its evidence for social structure and
behavior. The final paper by Christopher Mee is a brief reflection on
the role of women in Mycenean Greece with reference to the problematic
mortuary evidence in existing publications--e.g., lack of basic data on
sex of skeletons in many cases (but cf. good current work, such as in
the previous paper). Based on a less than representative, or random,
review, Mee observes an under-representation of females in burials. He
concludes that this is a reflection of social role, and goes on to argue
that in Mycenean Greece female status was ascribed, rather than
achieved, and, with the exception perhaps of the holders of some
religious positions, was essentially defined in terms of roles as wives
or daughters.