Sunshine and shambles: the Peter Mathers papers.
Pierce, Peter
ON 13 APRIL 1967, Peter Mathers, who had been living and working in
London since 1964, received the following telegram from Sydney:
'Will be announcing next Tuesday your novel wins one thousand
dollars Miles Franklin Literary Award Stop Official presentation to
author or nominee required Stop Please cable name of nominee Stop'.
The novel was Trap, which had been published by Cassell Australia in
1966. Its gestation, in common with the other novel, numerous stories
and plays that Mathers completed, along with so much more material that
remained unfinished, had been protracted and difficult. In the rich
depository of the Peter Mathers Papers in the State Library of Victoria,
(1) the author's literary and personal labours are extensively and
disarmingly displayed.
There is, for instance, a supposed publisher's reader's
report on Trap, evidently from an acquaintance of Mathers ('I know
the author does not consider this manuscript as finished'), who
judges that this book is 'not adapted to being read on
trains'. Successive exuberant paragraphs begin with caveats:
'Yet the book is not just a kitchen-sink Riders in the
Chariot'; 'yet the book is madly unpublishable';
'yet something must come of this book, somehow and sometime'.
In the spirit of Walt Whitman's anonymous reviews of his own volume
of verse, Leaves of Grass, these comments might be Mathers's
reflections on the current state of play with Trap. Indeed their hectic
brio makes it most likely that they are, hence constituting one of the
best jokes to be embedded within this archive.
Meanwhile, and in spite of hesitations and revisions, the novel was
completed. This was not enough to reassure Mathers that he could support
his wife and two daughters in Britain as a full-time writer. Among the
many intriguing items in his papers is a letter to Mathers dated 1
January 1965 from R. F. L. Bancroft, Superintendent of the Reading Room
of the British Museum, in response to an inquiry about the possibility
of work there as a researcher. Bancroft ended with questions that are
both searching, and in other ways besides the point: 'Have you a
university degree? Do you type? Have you done any professional research
work before? Have you any other qualifications?' In October 1966,
Mathers was half-heartedly pursuing another institutional option. He
approached the Home Office concerning the chances of a career in the
British Prison Service. Unlikely as each application appears, one feels
that Mathers had the talent for either position, as well as the anarchic
bent which surely would have disrupted each work place.
The Miles Franklin Award in the next year brought urgently needed
cash and critical recognition. In January 1968, the publisher Robert
Sessions sent Mathers a review of Thomas Keneally's novel Bring
Larks and Heroes (published in 1967, also by Cassell, it would win the
Miles Franklin in 1968, the year after Trap). Sessions commented that
'Keneally and Mathers are being flaunted in the same breath by some
(although they are in fact very different)'. How different their
subsequent careers would show. Keneally is still publishing fiction and
history forty years later. Mathers (who died in 2004) would produce only
one more novel, The Wort Papers (1972) and a collection of short
stories, the drolly titled A Change for the Better (1984). While Mathers
was as prolific as ever, his life became a series of desperate measures
to find occasional employment, or patronage, until finally his
circumstances were relieved somewhat by his being made an Emeritus
Fellow of the Literature Board of the Australia Council.
Late in 1967, Mathers took up an offer to be an adviser to students
in the Department of Speech and Theatre Arts at the University of
Pittsburgh. There being insufficient money to support them in the
States, Mathers's family went back to Melbourne. He followed them
at the end of 1968. Part of his job had been to finish a play of his
own, but whether that was ever managed is unclear. After his return to
Australia, Mathers was much occupied with ultimately fruitless efforts
to make a film of Trap. He sought literary grants persistently. In an
undated letter to Michael Costigan, Acting Secretary of the Literature
Board, Mathers wrote eloquently that 'the seeking of patronage is
an ancient tradition. I am part of this tradition of enmity, decency,
rage, work, sloth, pride and abasement'. In 1972 he made a scrappy
but poignant application for a Literature Board grant for 1973-6,
mentioning 'a novel I've worked at ten years. There is a novel
"Fish" and one "Flies". I work a lot: too much
perhaps'. But as a letter from Geoffrey Blainey, Chair of the
Literature Board, confirmed on 24 July 1973, Mathers secured the
three-year grant. No further novel would come of it.
By now he was in his early forties, having been born at Fulham in
London on 16 July 1931. As he averred in a statutory declaration on 2
May 2000, Mathers was 'conceived in Sydney or at sea'. His
resilience let him--though hardly without pain--press on through the
1970s, which was perhaps his most frustrating decade. In February 1971
he was divorced. In May 1973 he was evicted from his flat at 4/320
Rathdowne Street in Carlton for non-payment of rent. October 1974 found
him blowing 0.11 when breathalysed at Paddington in Sydney.
Writers-in-residencies sustained Mathers for some of this time. Most
surprising of them was at the Allen iron foundry in Melbourne's
western suburbs. There was a stint at La Trobe University in 1979 which
he found more congenial than that at the University of Melbourne in the
previous year. At the end of that stay (for part of which Mathers lived
in his borrowed office in the John Medley Building) came the cruellest
cut, the kind of misfortune to which he had often subjected his
redoubtable anti-heroes, Jack Trap and Percy Wort. This was a letter of
31 October 1978 that made an impossible demand: a request for a cheque
for $1318.43, the amount that Mathers had allegedly been overpaid during
his time at the university.
A brighter note of that year was the appearance of a paperback
edition of Trap. As usual this had not been a simple process. Penguin
had agreed to a reprint in 1976, but John Hooker the publisher (and
novelist) reneged in a letter of 27 June 1977. Fortunately for Mathers,
Bob Sessions--who had seen Trap through its proof stages at Cassells
twelve years before--had now moved to Thomas Nelson, which published the
novel under its imprint, Sphere Books. The front cover carried a
strangely contorted encomium from Patrick White: 'I found Trap very
funny, often beautiful, original and always unavoidable'.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Now out of print for nearly thirty years, Trap continues to attract
discriminating critical attention, being praised chiefly for its satire
and for its formal experiment. Yet each of these emphases needs further
examination. For Delys Bird, writing on 'Contemporary fiction'
in The Cambridge Companion to Australian Literature, Trap was 'a
brilliant satire on racism' and a novel preoccupied 'with the
complacencies of middle-class Australian society.' (2) In her
chapter 'Fiction: Innovation and Ideology' in The Oxford
Literary History of Australia, Susan Lever grouped Trap with David
Ireland's The Chantic Bird (1968) as 'one of the signpost
novels for a changing mood'. Elaborating, she stressed the
connection between the similar satirical targets of the authors and
their methods of narration: 'Both novels attacked the complacent
orderliness of Australian suburban life, using unreliable narrators to
observe their anti-authoritarian central figures'. (3)
In the case of Trap, the story is allegedly compiled from
'Pages from David David's last diary'. An ingenuous
public servant, David is under the thrall both of the anarchic Trap
(part-Aboriginal, part-Irish, part-Tierra del Fuegan, part-Australian
gentry) and of the circle of capitalists centred on Mrs Nathan, who
wishes to harness and subdue Trap, turn him to her own ends as no-one
has successfully done before. David pieces together Trap's story
from the testaments of those who have known him, from rumours, from the
man's own revelations. Thus the story of the nominal main character
emerges through the efforts of a narrator who is increasingly immersed
in the life that he is reconstructing. This was the method of Robert
Penn Warren's fictionalised tale of corrupt 1930s Louisiana
governor Huey Long in All the King's Men (1946). Closer to home,
this was also how David Meredith told the story of My Brother Jack
(1964) in the novel of that name. As has been remarked, accidentally or
otherwise, Mathers gives us another story of David and Jack.
This is also, in Laurence Sterne's famous remark on his own
novel, Tristram Shandy (1759-67), a tale of cock-and-bull, full of
diversions and misdirections, confusions and contradictions. We can
think with profit--as perhaps Mathers did--not only of Sterne (and
locally, the Xavier Herbert of Capricornia, 1938), but of the original
meaning of satire and its relation to how Mathers tells the story. As
The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature has it: 'Satire, in
Latin satura, probably equivalent to satura lanx, a dish of mixed
ingredients, a medley or farrago, of which the variety might lie in the
subjects chosen or in the form (dialogue, fable, anecdote, precept,
verse of various metres, combination of verse and prose), or in
both'. Trap vibrantly embraces such a 'medley or
farrago'. (4)
Its satirical targets are bluntly identified. Racism colours the
shocking vignette of the deaths of Trap's two uncles, by virtue of
their piety, rather than the crimes ascribed to them and attributed to
their colour. The telling of this episode is the more affecting because
it is seemingly offhand. Middle-class pretensions are an easier, and
milder mark. While Mrs Nathan condescends to Ray Lawler's Summer of
the Sevententh Doll 'with all its colourful slum characters',
she wonders where are 'the plays of Toorak and the other
better-type suburbs?' (p. 61). In a novel so imbued with politics
(which is more exactly to say political manipulation and corruption),
Mathers makes rough use of Eb Cruxtwist, sexual predator in a shoe
factory, but at large a keen subscriber to the ideals of B. A.
Santamaria's Catholic Rural Movement: a family dream of 'two
acre blocks, each with a cow or goat, a grape vine, hop trellis, apple
trees, vegetables, and a library of clean books' (p. 32).
Trap is often regarded with fascinated horror as an anti-social
renegade, imprisoned for numerous depredations, notably as a serial
killer of gaolers' dogs and for his part in the decapitation of a
murderer. He was involved in the hanging incidentally, as a
'contracting scaffoldwright' (p. 66). Yet Trap's politics
is equivocal. His father, Wilson, a former member of the International
Workers of the World, wants his son 'to approach, either with
stealth or wild abandon, all unpleasant things to seek their reformation
or destruction' (p. 242). However, Jack 'yearned for
assimilation' (p. 42). He is the provoked rather than the
provocateur. His influence on others--notably in the transformation of
David David--is potent, but essentially passive, a matter of stories
told, poses struck, rather than the methodical defiance of the state.
Trap remains, in a curious way, a ghost in the novel in which he is the
main character--feared, admired, often sighted (and slighted), subject
of wild surmise--but in truth as unknown to us as he is to his
biographer. In terms of his politics (and in his emotional affinities to
one of the foremost Australian ways of responding to life) Jack Trap is
a nihilist. Perhaps it is his own legend in which he least believes.
Six years after the appearance of Trap, Cassell published The Wort
Papers, another treatment of the antagonistic dependence of two men, in
this case the brothers Thomas and Percy Wort. Respectable Thomas is the
director of Mediums Limited, 'a not unimportant company in the
media' (p. 2), owner of newspapers, theatres, radio stations, part
of a television channel and--'as a gesture to our cultural
heritage' (p. 2)--an occasional publisher of fiction. When the
novel begins (though some time after many of its events), Mediums
Limited is about to become an associate of Mountain & Molesworth
Ltd, 'the brightest star in the mining firmament' (p. 3).
Accordingly, but only after undertaking company-ordained adventures in
Afghanistan, Patagonia (land of one of Trap's ancestors) and
Cambridge, where he makes love to a naturalist 'in fen and
ditch' (p. 4), Thomas is despatched on a tour of the M & M
mines in Western Australia.
What follows is a thriller-that-might-have-been which is compressed
into six pages. Thai General Wu, to whose country much of the M & M
ore is exported, is in Australia to preside over the opening of a new
loading jetty. While 'Asiomen, bodyguards, flunkeys, directors and
a mixed sprawl of celebrities bled down the gutter' (pp. 9-10),
Thomas saves the general from assassination by an Aboriginal skin-diver,
protesting against the desecration of his people's lands, the barb
of whose spear gun is 'a piece of bone set with shark's
teeth' (p. 9). It is at this time, while being feted by the press
for a brief season, that Thomas Wort's real troubles begin. He is
assailed by the phone calls, memoes, manuscripts, threats and imploring
of 'an unknown, racked writer, Matters' (p. 10). Finally a
telegram warns of the imminent delivery of the Wort papers, the
Worteriana of his scapegrace brother Percy, for so long an embarrassment
to the conventional and ambitious Thomas.
Mathers does not have fun at length with his self-portrait as
Matters, but does depict something like the author's working
environment: 'My rooms lined with words, filled with them. In
books, bundles and folders' (p. 17). Soon enough we have begun to
follow the mishaps of the Wort forebears in this country, first those of
William Wort, English-born father of Thomas and Percy, and his wife
Mary, who is afflicted 'by shingles and despair' (p. 26).
Numerous narratives of pioneering days are comically enlisted, for
instance when a vengeful swagman burns down the McKenzie-Dart property
where the Worts live and work. (A similar action, in the 1890s, was the
genesis of Banjo Paterson's 'Waltzing Matilda').
Restless William Wort is lured by the promise of the Australian
outback and goes so far as to seek work on a cattle station in the
Kimberley. In Broome, before heading inland, he finds himself among
'luggers, diving suits, Japanese, Koepangers, Malays, Chinese,
Binghis, Manxmen, Scots, Tasmanians, Texans, Englishmen, Bretons,
Capetowners, and so many others he thought he was being sent up'
(p. 57). Emerson exclaimed of Whitman's poetry, with admiration and
a touch of ambivalence, 'here are the nation's
inventories'. That is something of what Mathers's fiction
presents for us as he ranges deep and wide across the history and
landscape of Australia. His descriptive technique here, like
Whitman's, is parataxis, that is, the practice of a literary
democracy in which there is no hierarchy, no established order in the
names of the things that are being presented to us.
Arrived at Orebul Downs station, William is shown the wreckage of a
Dornier-Wright Roc aeroplane, the Kleine Nachtmusik, which had been
flown by 'famous goodwill mapping aviators with two cases of hock,
Wagner albums, Goethe in vellum, Protocols and illuminated
Fuhrer-endorsed messages of friendship' (p. 73). Here the comedy is
ventilated through the rude juxtaposition that parataxis enables. And to
speak of ventilation, and of the verbal resources of Mathers that are
richer in this novel, perhaps, than in Trap, is this rhapsody for farts:
'gloom-shattering, metal-ringing, face and mind shattering ... or,
better still, one of great lightness and inflammability, a bowelly
helium, not toxic but musky music-making, bells, miniature harps, a lone
violin'. (p. 114). In this joyously vulgar register, Mathers is
closest to his friend, supporter and contemporary, the playwright lack
Hibberd, analyst of solitariness and celebrity.
The Wort Papers is expansive in its embrace of so many regions of
Australia, generous, hyperbolic too, in that mode which the poet Les
Murray (whose career began at around the same time as Mathers), defined
as 'sprawl'. The Worts actually settle near Murray's
spirit country by the north-east coast of New South Wales, in the
mountain hamlet of Uppersass. This is a region 'laved by fringes of
monsoon, frost-free, not far from the sea, where share-farmers quickly
became owner-farmers, where roads were sealed, passion fruit grew wild,
pineapples grew in forty-fours, maize had to be ring-barked and the
Country Party ruled' (p. 150). A long, originally rural tradition
of yarn-spinning informs this writing as well, a tradition necessarily
too fond of what it describes to be rancorous, or satirical.
Percy Wort reflects on his way of telling stories. They are
'caves of recollection joined with one another by passages
sometimes long and narrow' (p. 105). If caves are literally his
preferred place of refuge, Percy's life is nevertheless a
peripatetic one, a recurrent set of escape acts from work and family
life--'I have gone away so many times' (p. 200). His instinct
is not for rebellion but for sanctuary. That, of course, always eludes
him. Mathers lets us know much more of Percy that of Trap. The former
has the knack of involving himself and bystanders in public, slapstick
routines; the latter is a screen upon which the anxieties of others are
projected. Percy, moreover, is given a wider poetic licence than Trap,
as in this description of crossing the Hawkesbury River in a squall on a
motor bike that he had bought in a Sydney pub after winning a lottery:
'I went onto the wrong side, where the whistling and groaning
girders, the rain squirting over the goggles and hammering on jacket and
oilskin cap, the shapeless spectres of boats and boatshed lights on
water, oil on the road gulping colour as though to swallow, made me
thoughtlessly toe the brake pedal ...' (p. 219).
It is Percy's fate to die like so many of the wandering lost
of colonial Australia, perishing alone in the bush. Tending his memory
and literary legacy, Matters is also solicitously on hand at the end and
'burned what the crows left' (p. 282) of Percy. He has the
last words in the novel, crisply reassuring Thomas Wort 'Have
disposed of the estate, sunk the boat, loaded up animals and pissed into
the wind. We move on' (p. 282). As Mathers moved on, for three
decades more of striving and sociability, seeing plays performed and
short stories published and maybe having said as much as he needed to in
the longer form of fiction. For those who seek them out, he left two
remarkable and enduring novels, Trap and The Wort Papers. In them, the
savage and unmerited misfortunes that befall his characters are
mitigated by the gentleness of disposition, the quietism, that was
supremely within their author's dispensation.
Notes
(1.) MS 13604. The collection consists of some 20 manuscript boxes
and complements an early acquisition (MS Box 2029-2030) by the State
Library of manuscript drafts plus related material for both Trap and The
Wort Papers.
(2.) Delys Bird, 'Contemporary Fiction' in Elizabeth
Webby, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Australian Literature, Melbourne:
Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 189.
(3.) Susan Lever, 'Fiction: Innovation and Ideology' in
Bruce Bennett and Jennifer Strauss, eds., The Oxford Literary History of
Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 313.
(4.) Paul Harvey, (ed), The Oxford Companion to Classical
Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937, p. 382.