Examining the average citation index of education in Rural Australia (now the Australian and International Journal of Rural Education).
Drummond, Aaron ; Halsey, R. John
INTRODUCTION
Since its inception in 1991, the Society for Provision of Education
in Rural Australia's (SPERA's) flagship journal, Education in
Rural Australia (1), has been attempting to raise the profile of rural
education and rural education research in Australia. The diversity of
SPERA's interests in rural education can be demonstrated by
reaching for the most recent edition of the journal at the time of this
article being written--the second issue of the 2011 edition. Chronicled
within its pages are descriptions of pre-service teachers' beliefs
about Education for Sustainability (Boon, 2011), the perceived
importance of university presence within rural Australia (Drummond,
Halsey & van Breda, 2011), and an examination of whether Vocational
Education is being used as a substitute for university education in
rural contexts (Curtis, 2011), amongst others. The issue prior this
contains discussions of investment in rural social space for the
promotion of sustainability (Lock, Reid & White, 2011), and the
views of rural residents on rural sustainability (Halsey, 2011), to name
a few. Clearly, rural educational research covers a diverse and
important range of topics.
The editors, and the authors the journal has chronicled, have
clearly attempted to bring quality research to bear upon rural education
issues. In the present day however, there is an increasing push for
research to be quantified in terms of its quality. The Excellence in
Research Australia (ERA, not to be confused with Education in Rural
Australia), attempted to categorise journals into quality bands, during
which time Education in Rural Australia was classified as a B journal.
Journals that similarly received a B ranking included the Australian
Journal of Education, and the British Journal of Psychology.
Following the revoking of the bands, a renewed push to recognise
citation indices as a proxy for quality has begun. Be it right or wrong,
to be competitive within academic publishing, a journal must be able to
quantify its quality in some manner. One method for examining the
quality has been to use citation indices such as Thomson-Reuters'
Impact Factor[tm]. Here, we seek to quantify the quality of Education in
Rural Australia in a similar manner, by adopting an Average Citation
Index (ACI) to examine the amount of citations the journal receives per
article published.
METHOD
To determine the number of citations the articles within the
journal received, we searched individually for each published article on
Google Scholar, and then followed their "cited by" links. As
in conventional citation measures, only citations from indexed journals
were used for calculating the ACI--books, reports and non-peer reviewed
journals were not included in the citation counts. To calculate the ACI
for each two year period, we examined the number of citations a journal
received during the ACI year to articles published in the two years
prior to the ACI year. We then divided the number of citations received
by the number of articles published by the journal in the two years
prior to the ACI year. The formula can be described mathematically as:
ACI = [a + b]/[c + a]
Where:
a = the number of citations to items published two years prior to
the ACI year
b = the number of citations to items published a year prior to the
ACI year
c = the number of items published two years prior to the ACI year;
and
d = the number of items published a year prior to the ACI year
Note that only citations during the ACI year count toward that
year's ACI. So if a 2008 article was cited in 2011, the 2010 ACI
would not change. As an example of a calculation of an ACI, for
2011's ACI, we divided the number of citations in 2011 to articles
published in the journal during 2009 and 2010 by the total number of
articles the journal published in 2009 and 2010. Mathematically:
2011ACI = [2009cites + 2010cites]/[2009articles + 2010articles]
An ACI over 5 years was also calculated by dividing the number of
2011 citations to articles published in the journal from 2006-2010 by
the total number of articles the journal published in these years.
Mathematically, the 5 yearly ACI for 2011 is expressed as:
5yearACI = [2006cites + 2007cites + 2008cites + 2009cites +
2010cites]/[2006articles + 2007articles + 2008articles + 2009articles +
2010articles]
As for the 2-year ACI, the 5-year ACI includes only citations
within 2011 toward the ACI for that year. This means that for the
journal to maintain its ACI, articles must continue to be cited each
year.
RESULTS
Only scholarly articles were included in the ACI
calculations--Editorial articles and messages to members were not
included as citable items for the purposes of calculating ACI. One
article in 2007 and two articles in 2006 were not indexed on Google
Scholar. These articles were excluded from both citations and total
article counts for any ACI calculations. Table 1. displays the 2-yearly
ACI's for the last four years of the journal and the five-yearly
ACI.
To determine the citation practices of the journal, the mean
citation index was broken down between external citations, and citations
made within Education in Rural Australia to articles within the journal
(self-cites). The citation against self-citation indices are displayed
in Figure 1.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
DISCUSSION
The present results show that SPERA's journal, Education in
Rural Australia (1) has a solid Average Citation Index, which has risen
considerably in 2011 when compared to previous years. The ACI rise is
characterised by a marked increase in self-citation however, and while
it is important for a journal to respect and use its own work, it is
vital that the journal's articles are cited outside of the journal
also. Nonetheless, the citation index is higher than comparable
Australian Education journals, for example, the Australian Journal of
Education, which holds a 2011 Thomson-Reuters' Impact Factor[tm] of
about 0.4. The 2011 impact factor would also rank the journal as 115th
out of 204 education journals by Field of Research (FoR) code. The
increasing number of articles with an international component (e.g.,
Barbour, 2011; Stevens, 2010) is also a good indicator of a wider
community of research emerging within the journal's pages.
Fluctuation in the Journal's ACI in the last four years is
concerning, as it appears from the data that the journal has
'on-years' with higher citation measures, and
'off-years' with lower ones. This may be indicative of the
slow turn-around time of the journal itself--with research tending to be
cited all at once during the on-years. This is supported by the fact
that not a single publication in the journal was cited within the year
of publication for any indexed year. These facts illustrate an essential
enhancement to the journal--online-first publication. If online-first
publication was available, the journal may receive citations to its
articles more frequently, and the work could be used (and cited)
immediately upon article acceptance.
The move to an online version of the SPERA journal is one that is
characterised by a wide variety of advantages. Online publication would
result in an increased ability to reach potential readers, an increase
in the speed of publication (and hence citation) and a reduction in
production costs for online-based subscriptions. Since presently, the
journal is converted to a PDF format before printing, little additional
work or technical expertise is required to facilitate the transition.
Conversely, difficulties with internet access and inflated internet
costs in rural and remote areas are indicative of the need to retain a
print-based option for the journal also. These arguments are support for
both an online and print-based publication model. The 2011 five-yearly
ACI closely matches the 2-year ACI for 2011. Five year citation indices
are more indicative of the long-term citation practices of a journal,
and tend to be a more stable indicator of a journals use. That the
5-year and 2-year ACI's for 2011 are relatively close is a good
indicator of these indices' reliability.
It should be noted that the method used to determine ACI in the
present article is less than perfect. A recent attempt by a researcher
to determine citation rates for the Public Library of Science One (PLoS
ONE) used Scopus (2) to calculate the index. When the official citation
index was released for the journal, the researcher found he had
underestimated the journal's impact by about 1.5 (Beltrao, 2009).
While doubtful that the present data underestimates the ACI by quite as
much as PloS ONE's was (primarily due to the lower total volume of
publications), it is likely that some underestimation has occurred. We
believe, based on Beltrao's attempts, and the incomplete nature of
cited by links on Google Scholar, that the journals ACI is likely to be
a little higher than the 0.65 calculated.
In addition, a number of government reports, books and informal
papers cite articles from the journal. These are not included in the ACI
due to an attempt to keep the ACI as close to conventional citation
measures as possible. The fact that articles in the journal are
receiving citations from these kinds of papers is a good indication that
the journal is having community impact, which is particularly important
in the field of education, in which many users are likely to be
practitioners.
One possible direction for the SPERA journal is to adopt an open
access policy to publishing in an attempt to increase its readership.
Doing this would have one primary advantage and disadvantage. While
readership would almost certainly increase, income from journal
subscriptions would likely fall. One option to remedy this is to create
open access versions of articles only if all authors are current SPERA
members. This would allow full dues-paying members to have open-access
articles, and may increase membership numbers as well as the breadth of
the journal's readership, without sacrificing subscriptions.
One advantage of calculating the ACI manually is that the recent
name change of the journal should not affect future ACI calculations.
Typically, journals indexed by traditional citation indices are
dramatically affected by changing their name for the two years following
the name change. This occurs because the citation indices are calculated
for the journal against the previous years that journal's title has
been indexed verbatim. It is therefore recommended that a manual
calculation of ACI be used for 2012 and 2013, before an official
citation index is sought in 2014. This will ensure that the 2012-2013
citation indices do not underestimate the journals true use. Overall the
present results are indicative of a respectable Average Citation Index
for the SPERA Journal, which has risen substantially during 2011. A
concerted effort by educational researchers to stay abreast of current
research directions and utilise the research should see the journals
quantitative indices of use continue to rise.
Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Sidney Myer
Foundation, The Myer Fund, and the Sidney Myer Chair of Rural Education
and Communities. We are indebted to M. van Breda for comments on an
earlier version of this paper.
REFERENCES
Barbour, M. K. (2011). The promise and the reality: exploring
virtual schooling in rural jurisdictions. Education in Rural Australia,
21, 1-20.
Beltrao, P. (2009). Guestimating PloS ONE impact factor (Update).
Public Rambling Blog, retrieved 21st June, 2012 from
http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com.au/2009/04/guestimating-plos-one-impact-factor.html
Boon, H. J. (2011) Beliefs and education for sustainability in
rural and regional South Australia. Education in Rural Australia, 21,
37-54.
Curtis, D. D. (2011) Tertiary education provision in rural
Australia: Is VET a substitute for, or a pathway into, Higher Education?
Education in Rural Australia, 21, 19-36.
Drummond, Halsey & van Breda, (2011). The perceived importance
of university presence in rural Australia. Education in Rural Australia,
21, 1-18.
Halsey, R. J. (2011). Farm fair voices, space, history, the middle
ground and 'The Future' of rural communities. Education in
Rural Australia, 21, 39-64.
Lock, G., Reid, J. & White, S. (2011). Investing in sustainable
and resilient rural social space: lessons for teacher education.
Education in Rural Australia, 21, 67-78.
Stevens, K. (2010) From closed to open classes--repositioning
schools to sustain rural communities. Education in Rural Australia, 20,
3-16.
Footnotes
(1) Now the Australian and International Journal of Rural Education
(2) We attempted to use Scopus as well, but found that Scopus does
not currently index articles in the SPERA journal. This is an issue that
requires rectifying since Scopus is becoming more common as a means of
examining the citation quantities of individual articles, and the
publication record of individual researchers.
Aaron Drummond * ([dagger]) & R. John Halsey ([dagger]) (^)
([dagger]) School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide,
Australia.
(^) Sidney Myer Chair of Rural Education and Communities.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed: C/-School of
Education, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001,
Australia. Phone: +61 8 8201 3425. Fax: +618 8201 3184. Email address:
Email address: aaron.drummond@flinders.edu.au
Table 1. Average Citation Index (ACI) across
the last four years, and a five-yearly ACI for
2011.
Year ACI
2008 0.05
2009 0.40
2010 0.09
2011 0.65
2011 (5-year) 0.54