Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands.
Leal, Claudia
Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the
Pacific Lowlands. By Kiran Asher (Durham and London: Duke University
Press, 2009. xv plus 247 pp. $22.95).
In the mid-1990s, Kiran Asher observed the burgeoning of
Colombia's black social movement. Following the constitutional
redefinition of the nation as multicultural, Law 70 of 1993 granted
communal territorial rights to the black communities living along the
rivers that traverse the forests of the Pacific lowlands. The so-called
Ley de Negritudes encouraged an unprecedented wave of black political
mobilization, which was largely based on the contested notion of black
ethnicity. I also took part in this exceptional and exiting moment,
working for three years in one of the projects depicted in Black and
Green.
Establishing an argument with Arturo Escobar, Asher's clear
and well-written book seeks explicitly to avoid viewing development and
social movements in oppositional terms by striving for a nuanced
exploration of their interconnections. It starts by giving an overview
of the intertwined legal and social processes that brought
"Afro-Colombian ethnicity to the limelight." It then focuses
on the black social movement of the mid-1990s and its relation to
"the development project." Finally, it closes with a chapter
that traces the disruptions caused by war since the late 1990s, as well
as the changes in state policy and the accommodations undergone by the
movement.
Asher's exploration of the "development" projects
operating in the region at the time centers on the contrasting ways in
which "local communities" and state officials conceived them.
She argues that while the former pushed for communal knowledge and
community participation to play a pivotal role, the latter emphasized
national interests and economic goals. Ironically, while communities
were largely successful in their demands, the projects ultimately helped
to expand the presence and legitimacy of the state in a marginal region.
The book's main contribution rests on its study of an
important part of the black social movement and its relationship to the
state. Asher aptly shows the divergences within the movement before
concentrating on one faction, the Proceso de Comunidades Negras (PCN).
While other groups were primarily interested in institutional politics
or the communal-land titling process, the PCN adopted an
anti-institutional stance. It sought to organize a broad black movement
based on an ethno-cultural strategy and, in the name of the
"communities", assert political control over the Pacific
lowlands. By following the PCN's performance regarding a series of
plans and projects, among them the formulation of the Plan de Desarrollo
para Comunidades Negras, Asher shows how its goals were ambitious,
vague, and fraught with logistical complications. Although the PCN
mistrusted and critiqued the state's proposals and practices, she
notes that it had to engage with the state, shared its language, and
depended on it for funds. Asher concludes that by working with the state
the PCN helped to legitimize it.
Asher also explores how women's cooperatives established in
the 1980s decided to remain autonomous from the PCN. While they adopted
some of its ethnic and territorial imperatives, they also pushed the PCN
to adopt their own gender and income generation concerns.
The methodology used for this study has great advantages, but also
a series of drawbacks. Asher draws on her observations during 15 months
spent in Colombia between 1993 and 1995, as well as on reports and other
published and unpublished materials. She makes ample use of her
participation in public meetings and cites a good number of interviews
with activists and state officials. Her narrative is very successful in
giving the book a flavor of the processes examined and incorporating the
voices of its participants. It is also an agreeable read.
But Asher's focus on public meetings as the core of the
interaction between the state and the organizations leaves out many
other ways of exploring this relation, which would have greatly
supported her interpretative move beyond oppositional binaries. The
confrontation at these very important meetings was one among several
strategies used by the PCN. There were other spaces of conflict and
collaboration. A closer look at the double role of Libia Grueso, one of
the PCN's most visible leaders, as both activist and official of
one of the state projects would have given a different perspective on
the complex relation between the state and this segment of the black
social movement. It would have also illustrated part of the intricacy
associated with local participation and the role of cultural criteria in
the development of the projects studied. According to Asher, these
crucial aspects gained a prominent place in state projects mainly due to
black pressure. Although the PCN did push strongly in this direction,
both the state and the black rural population were learning how to
implement participation amidst an incipient but fast-developing
organizational process. Thus, participation took various forms at
different scales and in different places.
The book would have also benefited from a better description of the
context in which this story unfolds -the region and its population- as
well as from a more detailed analysis of both the state and the
communities. On the one hand, Asher depicts and judges the
"development" projects that she highlights based on a few oral
and published statements rather than by what they actually accomplished.
This might explain why she considers BioPacifico, a biodiversity
conservation project, to have been guided mainly by an economic logic.
On the other hand, while she captures the PCN's goals and strategy
well, she does not venture far beyond the movement's leadership and
therefore does not give a sense of its broader structure. Although the
PCN apparently encompassed some 70 to 120 grassroots organizations,
grouped into three regional palenques, there is little explanation of
what these organizations were and how they related to the PCN. By using
the term "ethnic communities" to refer to the organizations,
Asher sidesteps both the issue of representation and the basis and
consequences of considering the rural population of the Pacific lowlands
in those terms.
Black and Green is a long-awaited book that makes an important
contribution to the study of black social movements in Latin America. It
is one of a series of books in Spanish, French, and English that from
different viewpoints study the Colombian black social movement of the
1990s, among them those by Odile Hoffmann (2004, 2007), Ulrich Oslender
(2008), and Arturo Escobar (2008). It is unfortunate that it suffers
from numerous spelling mistakes of Spanish words. However, its clarity
and pleasant writing will make it useful beyond a specialized public.
Claudia Leal
Universidad de los Andes, Bogota