首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月19日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Priesthood, pastors, bishops: public ministry for the Reformation and today.
  • 作者:Mattes, Mark C.
  • 期刊名称:Currents in Theology and Mission
  • 印刷版ISSN:0098-2113
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 期号:February
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Lutheran School of Theology and Mission
  • 摘要:By any standard of assessment, this is a remarkable book for Lutherans. One of the most touted shibboleths among Protestants is that of the "priesthood of all believers," a slogan which Wengert sees, with good reason, as a license for pining laity against clergy and vice versa. The textual evidence indicates that this notion cannot be traced to Luther, Melanchthon, or the Reformation era but is wholly an invention of Pietism. That insight alone would make this a noteworthy book. However, Wengert goes on to defend a robust vocation for bishops within the concept of ministry and debunking other notions such as the "transference" view of ministry.
  • 关键词:Books

Priesthood, pastors, bishops: public ministry for the Reformation and today.


Mattes, Mark C.


Priesthood, Pastors, Bishops: Public Ministry for the Reformation and Today. By Timothy J. Wengert. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2008. ix and 141 pages. Paper. $16.00.

By any standard of assessment, this is a remarkable book for Lutherans. One of the most touted shibboleths among Protestants is that of the "priesthood of all believers," a slogan which Wengert sees, with good reason, as a license for pining laity against clergy and vice versa. The textual evidence indicates that this notion cannot be traced to Luther, Melanchthon, or the Reformation era but is wholly an invention of Pietism. That insight alone would make this a noteworthy book. However, Wengert goes on to defend a robust vocation for bishops within the concept of ministry and debunking other notions such as the "transference" view of ministry.

After surveying the Reformation and confessional literature, Wengert contends that there is no disjunction between the "priesthood of all believers" and the ordained but instead a unity within the body of Christ. All Christians have callings and that of the ordained is simply one of those callings within the entire body. Wengert also leads us to cherish the office of oversight (bishops) and vest them with proper authority.

The phrase das allgemeine Priestertum aller Glaubigen is not to be found in Luther's writings (1). It was Spener, over a century and a half after the Reformation who designated the laity as a "spiritual priesthood." It is this Pietistic distinction which reinforces a division--even opposition--between clergy and laity, which is wholly unwarranted in early Lutheranism.

While no testimony can be given from Luther to assert a distinction between laity and clergy, his emphasis is that it is the authority of the proclaimed word that renews the public office of ministry (4). For Luther, there is a single Christian estate, in which many different vocations reside. Likewise, the "evangelical catholic" conviction of an ontological change in those ordained cannot be derived from Luther's notion of Stand (6). Hence there is no difference between clergy and laity other than respective offices (7). Stand, then, has nothing to do with an ontological essence; but by the same token, amt (office) has nothing to do with something "functionary,'' as a more "democratic" approach to congregational life might use to justify pastoral authority. Luther was not especially advocating a more democratic approach to ecclesiastical authority but was countering the popes ability to create a separate Stand for priests (8). Luther was in fact destroying the two-estate theory of laity and clergy operative in Rome (9). All Christians, then, are priests but all do not hold the pastoral office (12).

On the basis of article 5 of the Augsburg Confession, the doctrine of justification requires a public office so that the goods of forgiveness of sins might be distributed (39-40). And, from the perspective of the Confessions, episcopal oversight is admissible, provided that it conforms to the gospel (46), more specifically that the "eschatological edge" of the gospel is preserved (52). The confessions have no intent of reducing church orders to a kind of "federated Congregationalism" (73). In the confessions, pastors and bishops are not distinguished (74) but a distinctive office of oversight is legitimated under the rubric of service, and not lordship. A historic succession is possible, provided that it is accountable to the gospel first (76).

The office of the ministry, in the confessional writings, can be outlined thus: in the family it is administered through the parents, in the congregation through the pastor, and in the church, through the bishop. Again, bishops hold themselves to the purity or the gospel in bringing comfort to troubled consciences in opposition to Episcopal claims or the whim of a democratized priesthood.

Behind Wengert's historical and systematic work is a concern to affirm and uphold public ministry under the conditions of individualism, definitive of both North American and European church life, which as often as not wreak havoc in both congregations and synods. This is a volume worth pondering and needs to have its full impact on congregational, synodical, And churchwide structures.

Mark C. Mattes

Grand View College

Des Moines, Iowa
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有