Teachers holding back from telling: a key to student persistence on challenging tasks.
Roche, Anne ; Clarke, Doug
Anne Roche and Doug Clarke discuss the importance of developing
students' persistence in relation to problem solving during the use
of challenging tasks. They provide a useful list of strategies that
teachers can use to encourage persistence amongst their students.
We report here on our work with primary teachers to increase
persistence as students engage with challenging mathematics tasks as
part of the Encouraging Persistence Maintaining Challenge project
(EPMC). We developed sequences of tasks in various topic areas for
Grades 5 and 6, which require students to connect different aspects of
mathematics, to devise solution strategies for themselves, and to
explore more than one pathway to solutions. We surveyed teachers on
their strategies for encouraging student persistence, before and after
the experience of teaching some challenging tasks which we had provided
to them. In this article, we provide examples of the kinds of
challenging tasks project teachers are using with students, and share
teacher insights on helpful strategies for encouraging persistence.
Introduction
For many years, the importance of problem-solving in mathematics
education has been well recognised. As Thompson, Battista, Mayberry,
Yeatts and Zawojewski (2009) noted,
Good problems challenge students to
develop and apply strategies, serve as a
means to introduce new concepts, and
offer a context for using skills.
Problem solving is not a specific topic to be
taught but permeates all mathematics. (p. 2)
In recent years, there has been a greater emphasis in research and
curriculum documents on the important role played in problem solving by
challenging or cognitively demanding tasks (Stein, Smith, Henningsen
& Silver, 2009).
We use the term 'persistence' to describe the category of
student actions that include concentrating, applying themselves,
believing that they can succeed, and making an effort to learn.
Sullivan, Cheeseman, Michels, Mornane, Clarke, Roche and Middleton
(2011) characterised challenging tasks as those which require students
to:
* plan their approach, especially sequencing more than one step;
* process multiple pieces of information, with an expectation that
they make connections between those pieces, and see concepts in new
ways;
* engage with important mathematical ideas;
* choose their own strategies, goals, and level of accessing the
task;
* spend time on the task;
* explain their strategies and justify their thinking to the
teacher and other students; and
* extend their knowledge and thinking in new ways (p. 34).
We believe that all students should experience challenging tasks,
but sometimes teachers are reluctant to pose challenging tasks to
students, and this is compounded by students' reluctance to engage
with those tasks (Pogrow, 1988; Roche, Clarke, Sullivan & Cheeseman,
2013; Sullivan, Clarke & Clarke, 2013).
Our current project
The Encouraging Persistence Maintaining Challenge project (EPMC) is
researching a range of issues, including the kinds of teacher practice
which might encourage students to persist when working on challenging
tasks in mathematics.
The EPMC is a collaborative project involving university
researchers and classroom teachers in Victorian and Tasmanian schools.
Examples of our challenging tasks
Teachers met with the project team for two full days in February
2013, with four or five teachers attending from each school. An overview
of the project was given, and teachers were provided with ten
challenging tasks, in the form of detailed lesson notes. For the 36
primary teachers, the focus was on tasks involving the content areas of
multiplication and division at Years 5 and 6. All lessons were written
using the structure shown in Appendix 1 for the lesson Missing Number
Multiplication. Each lesson has what we have come to call a main task,
and this is often accompanied by an introductory task and consolidating
tasks. An important feature of the documentation is the inclusion of
enabling prompts (for students who have difficulty making a start on the
main task) and extending prompts (for students who find the main task
quite straightforward; see Sullivan, 2011).
To give a further sense of the kinds of tasks in these lessons, we
include the main task from two other lessons:
* from Patterns without Remainders.
Some people came for a sports day. When the people were put into
groups of 3, there was one person left over. When they were lined up in
rows of 4, there were two people left over. How many people might have
come to the sports day?
* from Working with a Calculator with a Broken Button.
For each expression, write two different expressions that show how
to use a calculator with the '4' button broken to do the
calculations:
234 x 9 314/3
Teachers were asked to teach as many of these tasks as possible
before returning to share their experiences and student work samples
with the larger group in June. Teachers were discouraged from telling
the students how to solve the problems, and asked to ensure that
students had plenty of time to work on the tasks.
Insights from teachers
At different points in the project, we have collected information
from teachers on their experiences.
Primary teachers' insights prior to teaching the challenging
tasks
In February, before any professional learning input from the
research team and the opportunity to trial challenging tasks, teachers
were asked to respond to a question, framed as follows: Sometimes when
students struggle with a mathematics task, they choose not to persist.
What kinds of things do you believe a teacher could do in the planning
stage of a lesson and during the lesson that would help those students
to persist? Please record as many as you can.
In the planning stage, teachers could ...
During the lesson, teachers could ...
Teachers were given seven lines for each stem, with a verbal
encouragement to put one thought on each line, for as many of the lines
as they wished to complete. The 36 primary teachers responded with 172
suggestions for the planning stage and 164 suggestions for during the
lesson, an average of 4.6 and 4.4 respectively per teacher. These were
grouped into categories by the research team. In Tables 1 and 2, the
most frequently occurring categories are listed, with illustrative
comments to elaborate the kinds of responses for each category, for the
planning stage, and during the lesson, respectively.
For both the planning and during the lesson stages, many teachers
focused on differentiating the tasks provided to students by the
preparation of prompts, and by grouping arrangements. Interestingly,
grouping suggestions of some teachers focused on mixed ability, while
others suggested groups of similar ability. Differences between the
comments in the two stages were the emphasis on careful choice of tasks
and resources, taking into account the teachers' knowledge of
individuals in relation to the content in the planning stage; and
encouraging students to share their thinking, the development of a
classroom culture, providing encouragement and enthusiasm, and
monitoring students while they are working on the task, during the
lesson.
Of course, there are some strategies which are more appropriately
addressed during planning (e.g., choice of tasks), and during the lesson
(e.g., the teacher monitoring students), respectively.
Primary teachers' insights after teaching up to ten tasks
In June, following the chance to try out up to 10 challenging
tasks, teachers were given a verbal encouragement to provide only one
thought, their most important change in practice that was different from
the way they planned and taught previously. Tables 3 and 4 show the most
frequently occurring categories. Of course, the request for just one
response led to a smaller number of responses than earlier in the year.
For this reason, percentages are not used here.
Possibly the most interesting difference in the data from before
the teaching of the lessons (February) and after (June) was the emphasis
on 'holding back'. In the June survey, 10 out of the 35
comments related to the teacher talking less, teaching less, or allowing
students to struggle. Although this number is not large, it is important
to remember that it represents a large proportion of responses out of
35.
Overall, the greatest change in the kinds of strategies offered by
teachers after the experience of teaching the challenging tasks appears
to be a focus on holding back from telling students how to solve
problems and giving them more time to think about and work on the tasks.
It is worth commenting that an instruction to teachers to
"hold back from telling" would be simplistic. While Hiebert
and colleagues (1997) noted that "intervening too much and too
deeply ... can easily cut off students' initiative and creativity,
and can remove the problematic nature of the material" (p. 9), this
does not imply a move away from any type of teacher telling and leaving
students to flounder unnecessarily. For example, there are types of
telling that stimulate students' mathematical thoughts "via
the introduction of new ideas into a classroom conversation"
(Lobato, Clarke & Ellis, 2005, p. 101). Finding the balance between
allowing students to struggle with important mathematics and supporting
their developing understanding is not easy. Nor is it easy to define in
terms of what teachers should say or do.
Conclusion
From our experiences in using the tasks described in this article
and in considering insights from teachers and the project team, we offer
the following list of strategies for encouraging persistence on
challenging tasks (Cheeseman, Clarke, Roche & Wilson, 2013;
Sullivan, Clarke, Clarke & Roche, 2013):
* some attempt is made to connect the task with students'
experience;
* ways of working are explained to students, including the type of
thinking in which they are expected to engage and what they might later
report to the class;
* the teacher communicates enthusiasm about the task, including
encouraging the students to persist with it, but holds back from telling
students how to do the task;
* classroom climate encourages risk taking, teachers expect
students to succeed, errors are part of learning, and students can learn
even if they do not complete the task;
* the lesson is structured to ensure that students have adequate
time to work on the challenging task;
* processes and expectations for recording are made clear,
including encouraging students to make appropriate notes along the way;
* the teacher moves around the class, predominantly observing
students at work, selecting students who might report and giving them a
sense of their role, intervening only when necessary to seek
clarification of potential misconceptions, to support students who
cannot proceed, and to challenge those who have completed the task; and
* there is time allowed for lesson review so that students see the
strategies of other students and any summaries from the teacher as
learning opportunities.
Student persistence is important. As one student wrote in a written
reflection:
"We do learn more when we're confused and we've got
to work our way out of it."
Appendix
Missing Number Multiplication
I did a multiplication question correctly for homework, but my
printer ran out of ink. I remember it looked like:
2 -- x 3 -- = -- -- 0
What might be the digits that did not print? (Give as many answers
as you can)
Rationale for the lesson
Mathematics is fundamentally about patterns and the patterns can
help us to understand key ideas. There are also important patterns in,
for example, the numbers when multiplied that have an answer that ends
in a 0.
Year level
Year 5-6
Particular pedagogical considerations
Explain that each line represents a digit (that is, the first
number has 2 digits). As a first prompt for those who finish, ask
whether they have all the possible answers. Encourage students to be
systematic about how they record their answers.
For the students
Sometimes solving multiplication and division problems is about
finding patterns. In this case the focus is on what numbers when
multiplied have an answer that ends in 0.
Enabling prompt
Change the format of the calculation to the following:
-- x -- = -- 0
35 x -- = --0
Extending prompt
Change the format of the calculation to the following:
-- x -- 0 x 3 -- = -- -- 0
Consolidating task
I did a multiplication question correctly for homework, but my
printer ran out of ink. I remember it looked like:
1 -- x 4 -- = -- 2
What might be the digits that that did not print? (Give as many
answers as you can.)
Some possible student solution strategies
20 x 30 (or 31, or 32, or 33, and so on up to 39) will work So will
20 (or 21, or 22, or 23, and so on up to 29) x 30 Then 25 x 32 (or 34,
or 36 or 38) will work Likewise 22 (or 24, or 26, or 28) x 30 will work
References
Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D., Roche, A. & Wilson, K. (2013).
Teachers' views of the challenging elements of a task. In V.
Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds), Mathematics education:
Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference
of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp.
154-161). Melbourne: MERGA.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P, Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne,
D., Murray, H., Olivier, A. & Human, P (1997). Making sense:
Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Lobato, J., Clarke, D. & Ellis, A. (2005). Initiating and
eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research
in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 101-136.
Pogrow, S. (1988). Teaching thinking to at-risk elementary
students. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 79-85.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A. & Silver, E. A.
(2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction (2nd ed.).
New York: Teachers College Press & National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.
Roche, A., Clarke, D., Sullivan, P & Cheeseman, J. (2013).
Strategies for encouraging students to persist on challenging tasks:
Some insights from work in classrooms. Australian Primary Mathematics
Classroom, 18(4), 27-33
Sullivan, P (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed
strategies. Australian Education Review 59. Camberwell, Victoria:
Australian Council for Educational Research.
Sullivan, P, Cheeseman, J., Michels, D., Mornane, A., Clarke, D.,
Roche, A. & Middleton, J. (2011). Challenging mathematics tasks:
What they are and how to use them. In L. Bragg (Ed.), Maths is
multi-dimensional (Proceedings of the 48th Annual Conference of the
Mathematical Association of Victoria, pp. 33-46). Melbourne:
Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Sullivan, P, Clarke, D. M. & Clarke, B. A. (2013). Teaching
with tasks for effective mathematics learning. New York: Springer.
Sullivan, P, Clarke, D., Clarke, D. & Roche, A. (2013).
Teachers' decisions about mathematics tasks when planning lessons.
In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds), Mathematics education:
Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference
of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp.
626-633). Melbourne: MERGA.
Thompson, D. R., Battista, M. T., Mayberry, S., Yeatts, K. L. &
Zawojewski, J. S. (2009). Navigating through problem solving and
reasoning in Grade 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.
Anne Roche
Australian Catholic University
<anne.roche@acu.edu.au>
Doug Clarke
Australian Catholic University
<doug.clarke@acu.edu.au>
Table 1. Most common strategies in the planning stage for encouraging
persistence on challenging tasks.
Strategy for the Number of Percentage of all Illustrative
planning stage comments comments (n=172) comments
Differentiation 46 26.7% * Make variations
to tasks to suit
the needs of the
children.
* Consider
extending/enabling
prompts.
Nature of tasks 25 14.5% * Develop a task
that is open
ended.
* Careful task
selection.
Grouping 18 10.5% * Ensure working
groups are mixed
ability.
* Group children
according to
ability.
Resources 18 10.5% * Concrete
material.
* Plan and collect
all equipment
needed.
Teacher knowledge 18 10.5% * Understand the
curriculum above
and below level.
--Content * Be aware of
misconceptions.
Teacher knowledge 11 6.4% * Understand
student learning
styles.
--Students * Ensure s/he
knows where
students are at.
Table 2. Most common strategies during the lesson for encouraging
persistence on challenging tasks.
Strategy for during Number of Percentage of all Illustrative
the lesson comments comments (n=164) comments
Discussion/question- 38 23.2% * Encouraging
students to
discuss
mathematics.
ing/ sharing * Question
students to
investigate
their thinking.
Differentiation 21 12.8% * Use enabling
prompts.
* Make changes
to the activity
to best suit
each child.
Grouping 20 12.2% * Allow
students to
work with a
partner to
share
strategies.
* Use flexible
groupings, kids
learn from each
other.
Culture 16 9.8% * Discuss
persistence
when it gets
tough.
* Reinforce
that taking
risks/making
mistakes is a
normal part of
learning.
Teacher enthusiasm/ 13 7.9% * Praise,
encourage
students by
focusing on
what they do
know.
encouragement * Present
positively--
enthuse
students.
Teacher monitoring 13 7.9% * Monitor
progress of
each
student/group
closely.
students * Check in with
all students.
Table 3. Most common new strategies in the planning stage for
encouraging persistence.
Strategy in the Number of Illustrative comments
planning stage teachers (n=35)
Differentiation 10 * Have the prompting questions
already to use during the
session, rather than waiting for
a particular misunderstanding to
occur.
* I have planned what I will say
to enable/challenge. This has
been a change as previously I
would do this as I am working
with students on tasks.
Nature of tasks 7 * More problem solving
activities. Plan more tasks that
they need to think about instead
of telling them what was wanted.
* I would probably now give much
harder tasks so that everyone had
a level of confusion.
Holding back 3 * Not telling them what to do.
* Not planning to 'teach' the
concept first but waiting for the
need to arise. Purposeful
learning.
Table 4. Most common new strategies during the lesson for encouraging
persistence.
Strategy during Number of Illustrative comments
the lesson teachers (n=35)
Discussion/ 11 * Asking lots more questions;
questioning/ e.g., So where could you go from
sharing there? Can you explain how you
got here? What could you do next?
Are you sure that's correct?
* Students share more of their
thinking more of the time.
Students are learning more from
sharing with each other, rather
than listening to me.
Holding back 10 * I model less at the beginning
of lessons.
* I am more careful to hold back
and not give the strategy which
could help in the initial stage
of the maths task.
Culture 9 * I am a lot more willing to say
to a student, "I know this is
hard, I want it to be hard you
need to go and think a bit more
about (some specific context)"
* Using phrases such as, "Yes
this is hard", "Zone of
confusion", "I want you to have a
go first", "I'm not going to help
you for 10 minutes", "Prove it to
me", "How do you know it is
correct?".