Editorial.
Marshall, Linda ; Swan, Paul
Throughout 2012 we have been working with groups of Principals,
assisting them to lead improvement in the teaching of mathematics in
their schools. As part of this project we recommended articles for
principals and school leaders to read. Many of the articles we
recommended came from previous issues of APMC. It was not our intention
to be biased in our selection of articles for the leaders to read--the
APMC articles were simply the best of their type. They were succinct,
relevant and the ideas could be applied directly to the school or
classroom situation.
Over 17 years APMC has built up a reputation as a high quality
journal. This issue is another example of the quality of work being
carried out in Australia. All the articles are written by Australian
educators working to improve the quality of mathematics teaching in
Australian settings. Two articles --Bridge, Day and Hurrell's rich
tasks and algebra article and Ormond's algebraic thinking
article--deal with how to improve the teaching of algebra in primary
school. While the articles focus on different ways to improve the
teaching of algebra, elements of each may be combined in order to
improve the effectiveness of algebra lessons.
Engagement is a theme that runs through two of the articles: the
interactive whiteboard articles, written by Northcote, McQuillan and
Beamish and Attard's engagement article. Northcote et al. examine
the conditions required to ensure the best use of interactive
whiteboards (IWB) in the classroom. One outcome of effective use of the
IWB is student engagement. Attard applies the use of an engagement
framework as a means for ensuring that our students are engaged in
mathematics classes.
The final article in this edition deals with the role of assessment
and how it can be used to inform teaching. Breed describes how a
learning and assessment framework helped inform her teaching. Having
read these articles several times in the editing process we could not
help thinking about how the principals in our leadership groups would
benefit from reading any one--or preferably all the articles in this
issue.
As we near the end of 2012 we would like to take this opportunity
to thank all the authors who contributed articles this year. A special
'thank you' goes to our Editorial Panel, who have reviewed a
record number of articles this year.