Courage! Cross-disciplinary connections & boundary crossings in environmental education and its research.
Cutter-Mackenzie, Amy
Dorothy: Your Majesty, If you were King, you wouldn't be
afraid of anything?
Lion: Not nobody, not nohow!
Tin Man: Not even a rhinocerous?
Lion: Imposserous!
Dorothy: How about a hippopotamus?
Lion: Why, I'd trash him from top to bottomamus!
Dorothy: Supposin' you met an elephant?
Lion: I'd wrap him up in cellophant!
Scarecrow: What if it were a brontosaurus?
Lion: I'd show him who was King of the Forest!
All Four: How?
Lion: How?
Lion: Courage! What makes a King out of a slave? Courage! What
makes the flag on the mast to wave? Courage! What makes the elephant
charge his tusk, in the misty mist or the dusky dusk? What makes the
muskrat guard his musk? Courage! What makes the sphinx the seventh
wonder? Courage! What makes the dawn come up like thunder? Courage! What
makes the Hottentot so hot? What puts the "ape" in apricot?
What have they got that I ain't got?
All Four: Courage! (Baum, 1900)
This special issue is a product of the 2012 Australian Association
for Environmental Education national conference, entitled 'Creating
Our next Courageous Steps'. The intention of the conference was to
exemplify and inspire courage in environmental education. From the
outset it is important to acknowledge that courage is a highly
idiosyncratic virtue. Winston Churchill notably once said 'courage
is rightly esteemed the first of human qualities ... because it is the
quality that guarantees all others'.
This issue brings together an eclectic assortment of academic
contributions that have been written by authors working across and
between disciplinary spaces. There is much courage in such work as it is
increasingly difficult to do what Dillon (2008, p. 257) describes as
'crossing boundaries, making connections, moving and relocating
ideas'. He adeptly depicts the process as 'a pedagogy of
connection' and 'boundary crossings'. While the research
represented in this special issue does not proclaim to make large leaps
or steps forward in environmental education and its research, perhaps
what it does do is push, tug or possibly antagonise one to further
contemplate the 'current' and 'next' disciplinary
connections, crossings and thresholds in environmental education.
Let's begin ...
Wilks and Rudner begin the issue with a thoughtful article
capturing children and young people's voices in the urban planning
process. The authors bring to the fore the inherent and problematic
nature of the decision-making process in urban planning whereby
consultation is lacking and devoid of children and young people's
civic participation. The authors reiterate Corkery et al. (2006, p. 8)
charge that 'to ignore the voice of young people in the creation of
the built environment risks ignorance in pretending to know what is
meaningful and relevant to them ... [thus] we must be conscious of
involving and empowering young people in the creation of their
world'. Through the guise of several case studies, the authors
generate creative dialogue about the urban design process and the nexus
between researchers, practitioners and children and young people in
doing so.
Hill follows with an exploration of the intersections and tensions
between sustainability education and outdoor learning. He problematises
experience, place, wilderness and outdoor education as modes of
sustainability education. The article is informed by Hill's
doctoral research where he worked with eight educators in Aotearoa New
Zealand to critically examine and re-envision school-based outdoor
education through sustainability perspectives. He concludes that
ignoring local places in lieu of more remote, pristine and exotic places
as sites of outdoor learning disrupts efforts for meaningful learning in
sustainability through presenting a dichotomous view of
'nature'.
The remaining articles in this special conference issue focus on
higher education or the 'university'. As a prelude, Thomas and
Matthias discuss the role of capabilities and their articulation in
universities, and highlight the tensions between what is sought by
industry and what is needed to embed sustainable development actions
into industry through the change agents graduated from our universities.
Sidiropoulos, Wex, and Sibley bring focus to tertiary international
students and the impact of sustainability interventions on their
environmental views and attitudes. The next two articles offer a unique
student voice, where Sloan, Davila and Malbon report upon their
respective experiences as three students employed as tutors in teaching
sustainability within The Fenner School of Environment and Society at
the Australian National University. And the final article by Wahr,
Underwood, Adams and Prideaux present the academic transformative
experiences of three of the authors in a sustainability curriculum
change process as part of a Bachelor of Arts (Textile Design) degree
program. The latter four articles engage with sustainability in higher
education from different disciplinary vantage points; their research
typically works from or within a 'sustainability current' as
Sauve (2005) identifies. Sauve (2005) classifies fifteen different
orientations or 'currents' of environmental education whereby
sustainability is but one, arguing that:
An overview of the literature in the field of environmental
education shows that, despite their shared concern for the
environment and their recognition of the central role of education
in enhancing human-environment relationships, various authors
(researchers, professors, educators, facilitators, associations,
organizations, etc.) adopt widely differing discourses on
environmental education, and propose diverse ways of practicing
educative activity in this field. (p. 11)
Sauve's (2005) work is a timely reminder of the existing,
different and emerging discourses that currently constitute
environmental education, and indeed the difficulties inherent in making
pedagogical connections and crossing boundaries which the authors of
this special issue certainly endeavour to do; albeit with courage.
References
Baum, F. (1900). The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Chicago: George M.
Hill Company.
Dillon, P. (2008). A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings:
methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and
between disciplines. Innovations in Education and Teaching
International, 45(3), 255-262.
Sauve, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education: Mapping a
complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of
Environmental Education, 10, 11-37.
Editor
Amy Cutter-Mackenzie
Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland, Australia