期刊名称：Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
印刷版ISSN：1302-3284
电子版ISSN：1308-0911
出版年度：2013
卷号：15
期号：2
页码：187-208
语种：Turkish
出版社：Dokuz Eylul Univeristy
摘要：The scholastic definition of usury was very clearly, whatever exceeds the principal or the sum loaned is usury. All scholastic writers agreed that usury was both a sin and a crime, punishable not only by canon law but also by the secular law of many countries. The basic scholastic thesis rested on a fundamental belief that ultimately all forms of human activity must be judged by natural law. Usury was not acceptable because it was unjust. The Aristotelian argument was subsidiary and when it was rejected in the fifteenth century the scholastic position was not thereby undermined. Aquinas clearly states Aristotelian view that usury was theft and contrary to justice.
关键词：Usury, Interest, Just Price, Medieval Economic Thought.;Tefecilik, Faiz, Adil Fiyat, Ortaçağ İktisat Düşüncesi.
