首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月23日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:ACADEMICS AS DECISION MAKERS: WHAT STYLE DO THEY ADOPT?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Zizah Che Senik
  • 期刊名称:ASEAN Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education
  • 电子版ISSN:1985-5826
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:69-81
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • 摘要:Many studies have focused on the decision-making styles (DMS) of managers, but very few have studied the DMS among academicians. Using the Rowe Decision Style Inventory, this study investigates the DMS of the academics in a public university in Malaysia. The objectives are to identify the common styles adopted by the academics and to determine their dominant styles in relation to their gender, age, faculty, qualifications, and years of service. This study employed a quantitative-questionnaire design that was distributed to 163 academics during an in-house training program. Four types of DMS—directive, analytical, conceptual, and behavioural styles—were identified with regard to gender, age, faculty, qualifications, and years of service. The results revealed that while the majority of the respondents have more than one dominant DMS, the conceptual and analytical styles predominate. Additionally, empirical evidence of variations in the types of DMS across demographic characteristics was found. These findings provide important implications for academics in making the most effective decisions within their profession. Keywords: decision-making style, managing education industry, organisational decision-making, malaysian higher education system
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有