首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月25日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparative Analysis of the Traditional Models for Capital Budgeting
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:M. J. Alhabeeb
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Marketing Studies
  • 印刷版ISSN:1918-719X
  • 电子版ISSN:1918-7203
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:8
  • 期号:6
  • 页码:16
  • DOI:10.5539/ijms.v8n6p16
  • 出版社:Canadian Center of Science and Education
  • 摘要:

    Financial decision making for investing firms requires metric tools for comparison and analysis. The managerial choice among many investment alternatives with complex possibilities has made it easier to rely on the now more advanced computer programs of simulation that considers the uncertainty and stochastic changes in the cash flow and risk levels. The major drawback here, especially in the academic world, is the increasing dependency on software and departing from the underlying mathematical reasoning that is most practically fathomed by the manual problem solving. This paper goes back to the tradition on analyzing and comparing the major models of capital budgeting.

  • 其他摘要:Financial decision making for investing firms requires metric tools for comparison and analysis. The managerial choice among many investment alternatives with complex possibilities has made it easier to rely on the now more advanced computer programs of simulation that considers the uncertainty and stochastic changes in the cash flow and risk levels. The major drawback here, especially in the academic world, is the increasing dependency on software and departing from the underlying mathematical reasoning that is most practically fathomed by the manual problem solving. This paper goes back to the tradition on analyzing and comparing the major models of capital budgeting.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有