首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月20日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Evaluating multiple-choice exams in large introductory physics courses
  • 其他标题:Evaluating multiple-choice exams in large introductory physics courses
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Michael Scott ; Tim Stelzer ; Gary Gladding
  • 期刊名称:Physical Review ST Physics Education Research
  • 电子版ISSN:1554-9178
  • 出版年度:2006
  • 卷号:2
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:20102
  • DOI:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020102
  • 出版社:American Physical Society
  • 摘要:The reliability and validity of professionally written multiple-choice exams have been extensively studied for exams such as the SAT, graduate record examination, and the force concept inventory. Much of the success of these multiple-choice exams is attributed to the careful construction of each question, as well as each response. In this study, the reliability and validity of scores from multiple-choice exams written for and administered in the large introductory physics courses at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign were investigated. The reliability of exam scores over the course of a semester results in approximately a 3% uncertainty in students’ total semester exam score. This semester test score uncertainty yields an uncertainty in the students’ assigned letter grade that is less than 1 3 of a letter grade. To study the validity of exam scores, a subset of students were ranked independently based on their multiple-choice score, graded explanations, and student interviews. The ranking of these students based on their multiple-choice score was found to be consistent with the ranking assigned by physics instructors based on the students’ written explanations ( r > 0.94 at the 95% confidence level) and oral interviews ( r = 0.94 − 0.09 0.06 ) .
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有