出版社：Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
摘要：In May 2011, the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) recognized same-sex unions as a family entity, what sets new directions to the homosexual movements in Brazil. However, even though this institutional milestone indicates a paradigm shift, it is noticeable that unfavorable notions on same-sex relationships and the rights of sexual minorities are still being spread throughout society. Aiming to outline how law and legal institutions have influenced people’s social life, this paper presents an empirical study on the discourses used by STF ministers in their decisions. Based upon the assumptions of critical discourse analysis, an evaluation has been made on the justifications given to the votes. The results indicated the existence of arguments that varied from the recognition of equality to the emphasis on difference, proving that, even though the decision was unanimous, there is still much to be conquered towards the accomplishment of equality.
关键词：Same-sex unions;STF’s decision;Arguments;Critical discourse analysis;Empirical study;União homoafetiva;decisão do STF;argumentos;análise crítica do discurso;estudo empírico
