首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月23日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 5: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2016
  • 作者:Antonia Ricci ; Ana Allende ; Declan Bolton
  • 期刊名称:EFSA Journal
  • 印刷版ISSN:1831-4732
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:n/a-n/a
  • DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4663
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma
  • 摘要:Abstract EFSA was requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety ( QPS ) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre‐assessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA ''s Scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended) and the completeness of the body of knowledge were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. A total of 57 biological agents were notified to EFSA between the end of April 2016 and the beginning of September 2016. From these, 34 biological agents already had a QPS status and did not require further evaluation, and 10 were not included in the evaluation as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci, biological groups which have been excluded from QPS evaluation since 2014. Three notifications for Streptomyces violaceoruber , one for Streptomyces albus , one for Bacillus circulans and four for Escherichia coli were not evaluated for QPS status because these species were recently assessed and considered not suitable for QPS status. Therefore, only four notifications related to three taxonomic units were evaluated for QPS status. Of these, Arthrobacter ramosus and Pseudomonas fluorescens are not recommended for the QPS list. Bacillus smithii is recommended for the QPS status.
  • 关键词:safety;QPS;bacteria;yeast;Arthrobacter ramosus;Bacillus smithii;Pseudomonas fluorescens
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有