期刊名称：International Journal of Designs for Learning
印刷版ISSN：2159-449X
出版年度：2016
卷号：7
期号：3
DOI：10.14434/ijdl.v7i3.19856
语种：English
出版社：Assiciation for Educational Communications & Technology / Indiana University Bloomington
摘要：Academic juries have a long tradition as a method of educating students and assessing their work. This tradition has been limited to a relatively narrow range of disciplines, such as architecture and various fi ne and performing arts. This article describes the case of an online graduate-level Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) program adopting and adapting a jury structure to support the development and assessment of students’ electronic portfolios. A key com ponent of the adoption and adaptation is the continuous e ff orts to improve the impact of juries across their 10-year implementation (2005-2015) in the IDT program. Therefore, this paper explicates the history of jury establishment and development within the IDT program, reports two evalua tions that provide students’ perspectives about juries, and details the IDT faculty members’ response to those evalua tions in an e ff ort to further improve juries as a program-wide innovation .
其他摘要：Academic juries have a long tradition as a method of educating students and assessing their work. This tradition has been limited to a relatively narrow range of disciplines, such as architecture and various fi ne and performing arts. This article describes the case of an online graduate-level Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) program adopting and adapting a jury structure to support the development and assessment of students’ electronic portfolios. A key com ponent of the adoption and adaptation is the continuous e ff orts to improve the impact of juries across their 10-year implementation (2005-2015) in the IDT program. Therefore, this paper explicates the history of jury establishment and development within the IDT program, reports two evalua tions that provide students’ perspectives about juries, and details the IDT faculty members’ response to those evalua tions in an e ff ort to further improve juries as a program-wide innovation .
