首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月26日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Impact of Different Levels of Epistemic Beliefs on Learning Processes and Outcomes in Vocational Education and Training
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Florian Berding ; Katharina Rolf-Wittlake ; Janes Buschenlange
  • 期刊名称:World Journal of Education
  • 印刷版ISSN:1925-0746
  • 电子版ISSN:1925-0754
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:7
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:p103
  • DOI:10.5430/wje.v7n3p103
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Sciedu Press
  • 摘要:Epistemic beliefs are individuals’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Modelling them is currently based on two central assumptions. First, epistemic beliefs are conceptualized as a multi-level construct, i.e. they exist on a general, academic, domain-specific and/or topic-specific level. Second, research assumes that their more concrete levels predict learning processes and outcomes more strongly than their more general levels. However, studies directly investigating these assumptions are still missing. 975 prospective retailers, wholesalers, bank assistants, and industrial assistants reported their grades and learning motivation in accounting and marketing as well as their epistemic beliefs in an effort to prove both assumptions within the context of Vocational Education and Training. Second-order confirmatory factor analysis confirms the multi-level conceptualization of epistemic beliefs. The findings here indicate a superiority of domain- and topic-specific epistemic beliefs compared to general epistemic beliefs for predicting motivation and achievement in marketing and accounting. The study concludes that domainand topic-specific epistemic beliefs explain different facets of learning phenomena. In addition, further research should concentrate more on both the domain- and topic-specific levels.
  • 其他摘要:Epistemic beliefs are individuals’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Modelling them is currently based on two central assumptions. First, epistemic beliefs are conceptualized as a multi-level construct, i.e. they exist on a general, academic, domain-specific and/or topic-specific level. Second, research assumes that their more concrete levels predict learning processes and outcomes more strongly than their more general levels. However, studies directly investigating these assumptions are still missing. 975 prospective retailers, wholesalers, bank assistants, and industrial assistants reported their grades and learning motivation in accounting and marketing as well as their epistemic beliefs in an effort to prove both assumptions within the context of Vocational Education and Training. Second-order confirmatory factor analysis confirms the multi-level conceptualization of epistemic beliefs. The findings here indicate a superiority of domain- and topic-specific epistemic beliefs compared to general epistemic beliefs for predicting motivation and achievement in marketing and accounting. The study concludes that domainand topic-specific epistemic beliefs explain different facets of learning phenomena. In addition, further research should concentrate more on both the domain- and topic-specific levels.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有