首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月26日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Alternative to Occupy: Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Emil Husted ; Allan Dreyer Hansen
  • 期刊名称:tripleC : Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:1726-670X
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:459-476
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:University of Salzburg
  • 摘要:In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics
  • 其他摘要:In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (leftist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Departing from Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting-off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as ‘the problem of particularization’. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by an infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue, they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics
  • 关键词:Radical Politics;Radical Movements;Radical Parties;Discourse Theory;Ernesto Laclau;Universalism;Particularism;Occupy Wall Street;The Alternative
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有