首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月01日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Refractive Power and Astigmatism between Digital Keratometer and Autorefractor
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Choi, Jae Won ; Han, Sang Youp ; Lee, Kyung Heon
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:0378-6471
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:58
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:21-26
  • DOI:10.3341/jkos.2017.58.1.21
  • 语种:Korean
  • 出版社:The Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 摘要:Purpose

    To compare the corneal refraction, astigmatism, and corneal marking for toric intraocular lens measured with a VERION® Image Guided System and an autorefractor in order to precisely determine the toric intraocular lens target.

    Methods

    The medical records of 29 eyes of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed to compare the corneal refraction, axis, and amount of astigmatism measured with a VERION® Image Guided System and an autorefractor. We compared the difference in marked axis for toric intraocular lenses as measured by a VERION Digital Marker and a manual marker.

    Results

    The average corneal refraction and amount of astigmatism were greater with the VERION® Image Guided System than with the autorefractor. The average difference in axis of astigmatism was 9.62°. The difference in axis of astigmatism in patients with more than 1.0 D of astigmatism (18 eyes) was 2.82 ± 2.27°, while that in patients with less than 1.0 D of astigmatism (11 eyes) was 20.27 ± 28.14°. The average difference in marked axis for toric intraocular lens measured by the VERION® Digital Marker and manual marker was 2.50° (0°-9.27°).

    Conclusions

    The corneal refraction and amount of astigmatism were significantly higher with the VERION® Image Guided System, so careful concern and comparison of surgical outcomes between the two devices is needed in biometry.

  • 关键词:Astigmatism; Autorefractor; Corneal refraction; Digital marker; VERION®
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有