首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月23日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Merco y RepTrak Pulse: Comparación cualitativa de atributos, variables y públicos
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:María Pallarés Renau ; Lorena López Font
  • 期刊名称:Icono 14
  • 电子版ISSN:1697-8293
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:190-219
  • DOI:10.7195/ri14.v15i2.1077
  • 出版社:Asociación Científica ICONO 14
  • 摘要:This article locates the new meanings of Corporate Reputation and their implications in the exponential appearance of rankings and metrics of intangible assets management of the companies. After a theoretical and historical review of the monitors studied, Merco and Rep Track Pulse, it was made a qualitative comparison of both; comparing dimensions, attributes, methodologies, interest groups and results. The objective is to find the main pedagogical, heuristic and systematic differences (Nohlen, 2006). Each monitor studied finds its strengths in the other’s weaknesses and vice versa. It will be noted that Merco “does not make a diagnosis of the level of engagement of interest groups, but rather the degree to which the company fulfills the conditions for that commitment” (Carreras Et., al 2013, p.347). About RepTrak, “this is a rational scale that explains the emergence of rational attitudes, typical of populations with a certain level of experience or information”. (Carreras Et., al 2013, p.380).
  • 关键词:Corporate Reputation;Merc;Reptrak Pulse;Interest Groups;Metrics and Intangible Asset Management;Reputación Corporativa;Merco;Rep Track Pulse;Grupos de interés;Métrica y Gestión de Intangibles
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有