期刊名称：Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
印刷版ISSN：0027-8424
电子版ISSN：1091-6490
出版年度：2009
卷号：106
期号：46
页码：19455-19460
DOI：10.1073/pnas.0909474106
语种：English
出版社：The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
摘要：Treatment of mice bearing orthotopic, metastatic tumors with anti-CD40 antibody resulted in only partial, transient anti-tumor effects whereas combined treatment with IL-2/anti-CD40, induced tumor regression. The mechanisms for these divergent anti-tumor responses were examined by profiling tumor-infiltrating leukocyte subsets and chemokine expression within the tumor microenvironment after immunotherapy. IL-2/anti-CD40, but not anti-CD40 alone, induced significant infiltration of established tumors by NK and CD8+ T cells. To further define the role of chemokines in leukocyte recruitment into tumors, we evaluated anti-tumor responses in mice lacking the chemokine receptor, CCR2. The anti-tumor effects and leukocyte recruitment mediated by anti-CD40 alone, were completely abolished in CCR2-/- mice. In contrast, IL-2/anti-CD40-mediated leukocyte recruitment and reductions in primary tumors and metastases were maintained in CCR2-/- mice. Treatment of mice with IL-2/anti-CD40, but not anti-CD40 alone, also caused an IFN-{gamma}-dependent increase in the expression of multiple Th1 chemokines within the tumor microenvironment. Interestingly, although IL-2/anti-CD40 treatment increased Tregs in the spleen, it also caused a coincident IFN-{gamma}-dependent reduction in CD4+/FoxP3+ Tregs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and Th2 chemokine expression specifically within the tumor microenvironment that was not observed after treatment with anti-CD40 alone. Similar effects were observed using IL-15 in combination with anti-CD40. Taken together, our data demonstrate that IL-2/anti-CD40, but not anti-CD40 alone, can preferentially reduce the overall immunosuppressive milieu within the tumor microenvironment. These results suggest that the use of anti-CD40 in combination with IL-2 or IL-15 may hold substantially more promise for clinical cancer treatment than anti-CD40 alone.
