首页    期刊浏览 2026年01月01日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union correctly decided?
  • 其他标题:Was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union correctly decided?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Nolan, Jacob M.
  • 期刊名称:IALS Student Law Review
  • 印刷版ISSN:2053-7646
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:38-41
  • DOI:10.14296/islr.v4i2.2427
  • 出版社:University of London
  • 摘要:Jacob M. Nolan gives a timely examination of the case of R (on the application of Miller and Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – arguably amongst the most important cases on constitutional law decided by the UK Supreme Court. In this landmark case the Supreme Court was required to rule on whether the UK Government (the executive) could trigger Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union without the authorisation of an Act of Parliament, through the use of the Crown’s prerogative. On an 8 – 3 majority, with Lords Reed, Carnwath, and Hughes dissenting, the Supreme Court upheld the previous High Court ruling that an Act of Parliament was first required.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有