首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月03日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Majoritarianism
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Allan, James
  • 期刊名称:Bond Law Review
  • 印刷版ISSN:1033-4505
  • 电子版ISSN:2202-4824
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:29
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:3
  • 出版社:Bond University
  • 摘要:Extract: All constitutional arrangements ultimately resort to some form of procedurally-based decision-making. In its broadest sense, ‘majoritarianism’ can refer to any component of a constitutional system in which those with final decision-making power have an equal say or vote in resolving disputes. Accordingly, the term describes not a substantive good but rather a type of procedure for making decisions — every person in some defined group counts the same and then to determine what to do or who wins or whom to elect or whether an amendment passes or fails you simply let the numbers count. More beats fewer. Take that as a working definition of ‘majoritarianism’.
  • 关键词:constitutional; system; populism; decision-making
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有