首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Realist Review: Current Practice and Future Prospects
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Rigmor C. Berg ; Julie Nanavati
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Research Practice
  • 印刷版ISSN:1712-851X
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:AU Press, Athabasca University, CANADA
  • 摘要:Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with explaining the outcomes of complex intervention programs. We undertook a systematic scoping review to examine the current practice of realist review. A systematic scoping review is a process of mapping the existing evidence base on a particular topic. We identified a growing body of literature using the realist review approach. We selected 54 reviews for our study. These reviews covered a range of topics, including health care, education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of exploratory scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in most reviews. Overall, there was little uniformity and transparency regarding many methodological issues. Specific methodological guidance may need to be developed if realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach.
  • 其他摘要:Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with explaining the outcomes of complex intervention programs. We undertook a systematic scoping review to examine the current practice of realist review. A systematic scoping review is a process of mapping the existing evidence base on a particular topic. We identified a growing body of literature using the realist review approach. We selected 54 reviews for our study. These reviews covered a range of topics, including health care, education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of exploratory scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in most reviews. Overall, there was little uniformity and transparency regarding many methodological issues. Specific methodological guidance may need to be developed if realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach.
  • 关键词:systematic review;systematic scoping review;mapping review;social intervention;realist review;realist synthesis;RAMESES publication standards
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有