摘要：The inclusion of Physical Education in the Languages Area has generated several debates. From that perspective, this study aims to understand how high school Physical Education teachers and school supervisors carry out such integration. A study from a post-structuralist perspective was developed in public schools in Porto Alegre. This paper is organized in five sections, as follows: investigative direction; legal documents guiding the debate; reflection on language; analysis of teachers’ and supervisors’ positions; and final considerations. Interpretations indicate that teachers interviewed seem to have different perceptions on Physical Education’s role in the new curriculum. The idea of language as communication and expression prevails, challenging us to reflect on the possibilities of expanding the discussion in initial and continuing teacher training.
其他摘要：The inclusion of Physical Education in the Languages Area has generated several debates. From that perspective, this study aims to understand how high school Physical Education teachers and school supervisors carry out such integration. A study from a post-structuralist perspective was developed in public schools in Porto Alegre. This paper is organized in five sections, as follows: investigative direction; legal documents guiding the debate; reflection on language; analysis of teachers’ and supervisors’ positions; and final considerations. Interpretations indicate that teachers interviewed seem to have different perceptions on Physical Education’s role in the new curriculum. The idea of language as communication and expression prevails, challenging us to reflect on the possibilities of expanding the discussion in initial and continuing teacher training.
