期刊名称：Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
印刷版ISSN：2238-3360
出版年度：2017
卷号：7
期号：4
DOI：10.17058/reci.v7i4.8988
语种：Portuguese
出版社：Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
摘要：Backgrounds and Objectives: Injuries caused by accidents with sharps instruments represent a serious problem in health institutions, the present work aimed was to verify if what the nursing academics say they know about the correct practices in the case of accidents with sharp instruments, corresponds or not to what they say they would do in case the accident happened. Methods: The sample was composed of eighty-eight students of two campus of a university in Paraná state. Data collection was made by an instrument composed of eight situations describing hypothetical accidents with sharp instruments in nursing practice. Each situation was followed by three alternatives: one 11 correct, another half correct, and the other one incorrect. For each description the student was asked to indicate which action the professional should take, and evaluate what the professional would probably do in the real situation. Results: It was observed a discrepancy between what the students say to "know" about the right practices in accidents and what they say to "do" facing an accident. Conclusion: The conclusion was that educational interventions and strategies in nursing schools need to be developed to minimize such differences, increase the perceptions about the risks involved in accidents with biological materials and emphasize the importance of preventive measures.
其他摘要：Backgrounds and Objectives: Injuries caused by accidents with sharps instruments represent a serious problem in health institutions, the present work aimed was to verify if what the nursing academics say they know about the correct practices in the case of
accidents with sharp instruments, corresponds or not to what they say they would do in case the accident happened. Methods: The sample was composed of eighty-eight students of two campus of a university in Paraná state. Data collection was made by an instrument composed of eight situations describing hypothetical accidents with sharp
instruments in nursing practice. Each situation was followed by three alternatives: one 11 correct, another half correct, and the other one incorrect. For each description the student was asked to indicate which action the professional should take, and evaluate what the professional would probably do in the real situation. Results: It was observed
a discrepancy between what the students say to "know" about the right practices in accidents and what they say to "do" facing an accident. Conclusion: The conclusion was that educational interventions and strategies in nursing schools need to be developed to minimize such differences, increase the perceptions about the risks
involved in accidents with biological materials and emphasize the importance of preventive measures.
KEYWORDS: Occupational risks. Accidents, Occupational. Occupational Health. Wounds, Penetrating. Nursing Team.
