首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月01日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Peter Kokol , PhD ; Helena Blažun Vošner , PhD, PhD
  • 期刊名称:Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
  • 印刷版ISSN:0025-7338
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:106
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:81-86
  • DOI:10.5195/jmla.2018.181
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Medical Library Association
  • 摘要:Objective The overall aim of the present study was to compare the coverage of existing research funding information for articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases. Methods The numbers of articles with funding information published in 2015 were identified in the three selected databases and compared using bibliometric analysis of a sample of twenty-eight prestigious medical journals. Results Frequency analysis of the number of articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases. The largest proportion of articles with funding information was found in Web of Science (29.0%), followed by PubMed (14.6%) and Scopus (7.7%). Conclusion The results show that coverage of funding information differs significantly among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases in a sample of the same medical journals. Moreover, we found that, currently, funding data in PubMed is more difficult to obtain and analyze compared with that in the other two databases.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有