期刊名称:Archai: revista de estudos sobre as origens do pensamento ocidental
印刷版ISSN:1984-249X
出版年度:2017
期号:22
页码:123
语种:English
出版社:Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal / Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
摘要:Like Raphael Hythloday, Marco Polo narrated his journey to Kublai Khan, the Emperor of the Tartars, presenting a catalogue of places and a cartography of 55 cities. The magic realism of Italo Calvino, the lush and synaesthetic descriptions in Invisible Cities (1972) construct a symbolic imaginarium of utopian paradigms. The taxonomy of all these cities sheds light on their relationship to man: cities and memory, cities and desire, cities and signs, cities and eyes, cities and names, cities and the dead, cities and the sky, continuous cities and trading cities. Some of them have an indivisible existence whilst others contain contradictions, some are more ethereal and others much more tangible, but all of them are real in the imagination and only inhabit an abstract space. Could we define them as “non-places” or “good-places”? Their geometries are different and whilst some represent what is necessary but does not exist yet, others represent what is potentially imaginable and credible but not achievable: could this be a coherent definition of utopia? Are there cities that are too believable to be true? This article aims to reconstruct the main lines of Utopia’s genealogy, regarding the socio-political desire for the ideal state, from Plato to Italo Calvino, answering these two main questions: are ideal cities utopian spaces or imaginary places? Does utopia therefore fail where reality begins?
其他摘要:Like Raphael Hythloday, Marco Polo narrated his journey to Kublai Khan, the Emperor of the Tartars, presenting a catalogue of places and a cartography of 55 cities. The magic realism of Italo Calvino, the lush and synaesthetic descriptions in Invisible Cities (1972) construct a symbolic imaginarium of utopian paradigms. The taxonomy of all these cities sheds light on their relationship to man: cities and memory, cities and desire, cities and signs, cities and eyes, cities and names, cities and the dead, cities and the sky, continuous cities and trading cities. Some of them have an indivisible existence whilst others contain contradictions, some are more ethereal and others much more tangible, but all of them are real in the imagination and only inhabit an abstract space. Could we define them as “non-places” or “good-places”? Their geometries are different and whilst some represent what is necessary but does not exist yet, others represent what is potentially imaginable and credible but not achievable: could this be a coherent definition of utopia? Are there cities that are too believable to be true? This article aims to reconstruct the main lines of Utopia’s genealogy, regarding the socio-political desire for the ideal state, from Plato to Italo Calvino, answering these two main questions: are ideal cities utopian spaces or imaginary places? Does utopia therefore fail where reality begins?