摘要：Se analiza la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional sobre igualdad, estudiando su aproximación a cuatro formas de entender aquella. Se postula que no obstante la creciente recepción de nociones alternativas, dicha jurisprudencia se mantiene firmemente ligada a la igualdad tradicional o aristotélica.
其他摘要：This article discusses the case-law of the Constitutional Court about equality, analysing how it deals with four different ways to understand equality. It is affirmed that, disregarding the increasing reception of alternative notions, such case-law is firmly committed to traditional or Aristotelian equality.
