首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月28日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Relationships between Mechanical Variables in the Traditional and Close-Grip Bench Press
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Robert G. Lockie ; Samuel J. Callaghan ; Matthew R. Moreno
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Human Kinetics
  • 印刷版ISSN:1640-5544
  • 电子版ISSN:1899-7562
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:60
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:19-28
  • DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0109
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Walter de Gruyter GmbH
  • 摘要:The study aim was to determine relationships between mechanical variables in the one-repetition maximum (1RM) traditional bench press (TBP) and close-grip bench press (CGBP). Twenty resistance-trained men completed a TBP and CGBP 1RM. The TBP was performed with the preferred grip; the CGBP with a grip width of 95% biacromial distance. A linear position transducer measured: lift distance and duration; work; and peak and mean power, velocity, and force. Paired samples t-tests (p < 0.05) compared the 1RM and mechanical variables for the TBP and CGBP; effect sizes (d) were also calculated. Pearson’s correlations (r; p < 0.05) computed relationships between the TBP and CGBP. 1RM, lift duration, and mean force were greater in the TBP (d = 0.30-3.20). Peak power and velocity was greater for the CGBP (d = 0.50-1.29). The 1RM TBP correlated with CGBP 1RM, power, and force (r = 0.685-0.982). TBP work correlated with CGBP 1RM, lift distance, power, force, and work (r = 0.542-0.931). TBP power correlated with CGBP 1RM, power, force, velocity, and work (r = 0.484-0.704). TBP peak and mean force related to CGBP 1RM, power, and force (r = 0.596-0.980). Due to relationships between the load, work, power, and force for the TBP and CGBP, the CGBP could provide similar strength adaptations to the TBP with long-term use. The velocity profile for the CGBP was different to that of the TBP. The CGBP could be used specifically to improve high-velocity, upper-body pushing movements.
  • 关键词:1RM ; bar velocity ; force ; linear position transducer ; power ; upper-body strength
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有