首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月14日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Artificial Communication? The Production of Contingency by Algorithms
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Elena Esposito
  • 期刊名称:Zeitschrift für Soziologie
  • 印刷版ISSN:0340-1804
  • 电子版ISSN:2366-0325
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:46
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:249-265
  • DOI:10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1014
  • 出版社:Walter de Gruyter GmbH
  • 摘要:

    Discourse about smart algorithms and digital social agents still refers primarily to the construction of artificial intelligence that reproduces the faculties of individuals. Recent developments, however, show that algorithms are more efficient when they abandon this goal and try instead to reproduce the ability to communicate. Algorithms that do not “think” like people can affect the ability to obtain and process information in society. Referring to the concept of communication in Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems, this paper critically reconstructs the debate on the computational turn of big data as the artificial reproduction not of intelligence but of communication. Self-learning algorithms parasitically take advantage – be it consciously or unaware – of the contribution of web users to a “virtual double contingency.” This provides society with information that is not part of the thoughts of anyone, but, nevertheless, enters the communication circuit and raises its complexity. The concept of communication should be reconsidered to take account of these developments, including (or not) the possibility of communicating with algorithms.

  • 关键词:Social Algorithms ; Big Data ; Artificial Intelligence ; Neural Networks ; Deep Learning ; Double Contingency ; Systems Theory Schlüsselwörter: Soziale Algorithmen ; Big Data ; Künstliche Intelligenz ; Neurale Netzwerke ; Tiefgehendes Lernen ; Doppelte Kontingenz ; Systemtheorie Article note This text is an expanded and revised version of the inaugural lecture of the Niklas Luhmann Guest Professorship 2015 at Bielefeld University. For comments, criticism, and suggestions on an earlier draft of this paper, I would like to thank David Stark, Alberto Cevolini, Giancarlo Corsi, and the anonymous referees of Zeitschrift für Soziologie
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有