首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Advancing clinical reasoning in virtual patients – development and application of a conceptual framework
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Inga Hege ; Andrzej A. Kononowicz ; Norman B. Berman
  • 期刊名称:GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
  • 印刷版ISSN:1860-3572
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:35
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-19
  • DOI:10.3205/zma001159
  • 出版社:German Medical Science
  • 摘要:Background: Clinical reasoning is a complex skill students have to acquire during their education. For educators it is difficult to explain their reasoning to students, because it is partly an automatic and unconscious process. Virtual Patients (VPs) are used to support the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills in healthcare education. However, until now it remains unclear which features or settings of VPs optimally foster clinical reasoning. Therefore, our aims were to identify key concepts of the clinical reasoning process in a qualitative approach and draw conclusions on how each concept can be enhanced to advance the learning of clinical reasoning with virtual patients. Methods: We chose a grounded theory approach to identify key categories and concepts of learning clinical reasoning and develop a framework. Throughout this process, the emerging codes were discussed with a panel of interdisciplinary experts. In a second step we applied the framework to virtual patients. Results: Based on the data we identified the core category as the "multifactorial nature of learning clinical reasoning". This category is reflected in the following five main categories: Psychological Theories, Patient-centeredness, Context, Learner-centeredness, and Teaching/Assessment. Each category encompasses between four and six related concepts. Conclusions: With our approach we were able to elaborate how key categories and concepts of clinical reasoning can be applied to virtual patients. This includes aspects such as allowing learners to access a large number of VPs with adaptable levels of complexity and feedback or emphasizing dual processing, errors, and uncertainty.
  • 关键词:Virtual Patients; Clinical Reasoning; Qualitative Research; Healthcare Education
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有