首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月19日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Five years of PCK summit, what has endured: 2. a factorial analysis of correspondence of the science PCK published papers
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Brunno Carvalho Gastaldo ; Pablo Micael Castro ; Paula Homem de Mello
  • 期刊名称:Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas
  • 印刷版ISSN:2174-6486
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 期号:Extra
  • 页码:601-606
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Universitat de València
  • 摘要:Trying to understand teacher’s professional knowledge, Shulman has popularised the Pedagogical Content Knowledge, from then on several models were proposed. To minimise such differences the PCK Summit was held aiming to develop a single model to unify the field. However, five years has passed and none of the researchers present at the event has adopted the Consensus Model, leaving a question of its impact on them. To access it, a lexicometric analysis of the papers published before and after the Summit was performed, being presented here the factorial analysis of correspondence, which has shown that the questions of the papers published before lead to the main questions of the event, and were solved in it, changing the subject of interest of the researchers. Another important aspect is that the discourse of the researchers put in the same work group in the Summit became more similar after it, showing that the Summit exert some effect on the researchers
  • 其他摘要:Trying to understand teacher’s professional knowledge, Shulman has popularised the Pedagogical Content Knowledge, from then on several models were proposed. To minimise such differences the PCK Summit was held aiming to develop a single model to unify the field. However, five years has passed and none of the researchers present at the event has adopted the Consensus Model, leaving a question of its impact on them. To access it, a lexicometric analysis of the papers published before and after the Summit was performed, being presented here the factorial analysis of correspondence, which has shown that the questions of the papers published before lead to the main questions of the event, and were solved in it, changing the subject of interest of the researchers. Another important aspect is that the discourse of the researchers put in the same work group in the Summit became more similar after it, showing that the Summit exert some effect on the researchers
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有