首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月27日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Actitudes y percepciones de los evaluadores de la carrera científica en Argentina sobre la publicación en acceso abierto
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Paola Bongiovani ; Sandra Miguel ; Tony Hernández-Pérez
  • 期刊名称:Revista española de Documentación Científica
  • 印刷版ISSN:1988-4621
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:40
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:171
  • DOI:10.3989/redc.2017.2.1404
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
  • 摘要:This study analyzes attitudes and perceptions of open access publishing among researchers who evaluate scientific careers in Argentina, focusing on differences in age range, thematic area and institution affiliation. The results indicate that evaluators maintain traditional attitudes and opinions in both the choice of the journal where they themselves publish and the process of evaluating the research output of their peers. The journal peer-review process, publishing prestige, impact factor and presence in international and regional indexes are highly valued. But the open access journal model is not considered as a key factor in either their decisions about their own publications or in their evaluation of other researchers. The positive opinion about publishing in OA increases with the evaluator’s age. It is promising that 61% of evaluators have published at least one open access article in the last five years and they give greater importance to this aspect when evaluating their peers.
  • 其他摘要:This study analyzes attitudes and perceptions of open access publishing among researchers who evaluate scientific careers in Argentina, focusing on differences in age range, thematic area and institution affiliation. The results indicate that evaluators maintain traditional attitudes and opinions in both the choice of the journal where they themselves publish and the process of evaluating the research output of their peers. The journal peer-review process, publishing prestige, impact factor and presence in international and regional indexes are highly valued. But the open access journal model is not considered as a key factor in either their decisions about their own publications or in their evaluation of other researchers. The positive opinion about publishing in OA increases with the evaluator’s age. It is promising that 61% of evaluators have published at least one open access article in the last five years and they give greater importance to this aspect when evaluating their peers.
  • 关键词:Ciencias Sociales España Internet Web of Science bases de datos bibliometría bibliotecas universitarias calidad comunicación científica evaluación factor de impacto indicadores indicadores bibliométricos investigación patentes producción científica recuperación de información revistas científicas universidad universidades usabilidad Contenido de la revista Buscar
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有