摘要：Jurisprudence. The story of Legal Realism has been retold for decades. Authorshave dedicated countless books,2 law review articles,3 and blog posts4to the subject. Legal and other scholars repeatedly have attempted to definebetter the movement and ascertain its adherents. Although the usual suspects—Karl Llewellyn, Roscoe Pound, and Jerome Frank—are almost alwaysa part of the conversation, surprisingly few agree on the totality ofRealism’s personage or parameters. The lists of those considered realists—and there are many—are constantly expanding and contracting. The movement’steachings and implications are ever-evaluated. In all of this allegedevolution, however, one thing has remained constant: male-centered descriptionsof Legal Realism have occupied the center of the discussion.
