首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月21日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:日本語を母語とする幼児及び年少児童の格助詞学習における項省略の影響:人工格助詞を用いた検討
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:趙 曌 ; 酒井 弘
  • 期刊名称:認知科学
  • 印刷版ISSN:1341-7924
  • 电子版ISSN:1881-5995
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:24
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:344-359
  • DOI:10.11225/jcss.24.344
  • 语种:Japanese
  • 出版社:Japanese Cognitive Science Society
  • 摘要:

    This study investigated how argument omissions of a sentence affects language learning by focusing on Japanese object case-markers. To examine this point, we clarify how argument omission of the sentence input affects Japanese children at age four to seven to learn artificial case-markers. Particularly, it explores which of the following two is useful in children: the full-argument sentence with word order information and high processing cost or the argument-omitted sentence with no word order information and low processing cost. Participants watched and imitated four single-action-scenarios while listening to sentences where two artificial case-markers, po and bi, referred to the subject and object, respectively. Half of the participants learned full-argument sentences (“ saru po ushi bi oshita : monkey-NOM cattle-ACC pushed”), and the other half learned argument-omitted sentence with one argument omitted (“ saru po/bi oshita : monkey-NOM/ monkey-ACC pushed”). In a later test, participants completed forced-choice discrimination of scenarios after hearing sentences (OSV, OV, SV and SOV) with either po or bi. A mixed effect model for children’s response (correct answer or incorrect answer) showed that the argument-omitted group of five, six and seven year-old children comprehended OSV and OV sentences well. However, the full-argument group of five, six,seven year-old children comprehended those sentences poorly. On the other hand, the four year olds could not apply it to learning “ bi ”. These results indicate that sentences without case-marker omission was less useful for children in learning object case-marker compared to sentences with case-marker omission. A possible explanation of this result is that children pay more attention to case-markers when they process sentences with argument omission since case-markers are the only reliable cue to distinguish the subject and the object. This study provides the first empirical evidence that argument omission plays a positive role in case-marker learning by the children who learn a language with frequent argument omission.

  • 关键词:格助詞;人工格助詞;省略;言語情報;項;インプット;case-marker;artificial case-marker;omission;linguistic information;argument;input
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有