首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月25日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Open for Business or Opening Pandora’s Box&63; A Constructive Critique of Corporate Engagement in Water Policy&58; An Introduction
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Nick Hepworth
  • 期刊名称:Water Alternatives
  • 印刷版ISSN:1965-0175
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:5
  • 页码:543-562
  • 出版社:Water Alternatives Association
  • 摘要:The corporate world is waking to the realisation that improved water management is fundamental for future prosperity and human well-being. This special issue explores aspects of its response&58; from the application of an array of analytical tools such as water footprint accounting, risk filters and standards&59; water use efficiencies&59; derivatives and insurance mechanisms&59; to collaborative infrastructure and watershed projects&59; stakeholder engagement and attempts to influence water governance at all scales. Drawing on the papers in this issue the motivations for this new agenda are traced and its potential in helping to unlock some of our most intractable water challenges, or to open a Pandora’s box of controversies are considered. Key concerns include the potential for diverging corporate and public interests&59; policy and regulatory capture&59; privileging of economic over social perspectives&59; process inequities&59; displacement of existing water management priorities, and the risks of misguided interventions which undermine institutional and hydrological sustainability. Reflecting on these and the state of research on the topic eight priorities for a constructive response are discussed&58; closing the legitimacy gap&59; evaluating outcomes&59; reviewing evaluative tools&59; representation and inclusiveness&59; conceptual and methodological groundwork&59; outreach&59; and involvement and mobilisation. In conclusion, corporate engagement on water has great potential as both a progressive or reactionary force. Debate, research, scrutiny and action are urged to differentiate the 'good', the 'bad' and the 'ugly' and to pose fundamental questions about sustainability and equity.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有