首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月09日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Case for a Global Ban on Asbestos
  • 作者:Joseph LaDou ; Barry Castleman ; Arthur Frank
  • 期刊名称:Environmental Health Perspectives
  • 印刷版ISSN:0091-6765
  • 电子版ISSN:1552-9924
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:118
  • 期号:7
  • 页码:897-901
  • DOI:10.1289/ehp.1002285
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:OCR Subscription Services Inc
  • 摘要:Background All forms of asbestos are now banned in 52 countries. Safer products have replaced many materials that once were made with it. Nonetheless, many countries still use, import, and export asbestos and asbestos-containing products, and in those that have banned other forms of asbestos, the so-called “controlled use” of chrysotile asbestos is often exempted from the ban. In fact, chrysotile has accounted for > 95% of all the asbestos used globally. Objective We examined and evaluated the literature used to support the exemption of chrysotile asbestos from the ban and how its exemption reflects the political and economic influence of the asbestos mining and manufacturing industry. Discussion All forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are proven human carcinogens. All forms cause malignant mesothelioma and lung and laryngeal cancers, and may cause ovarian, gastrointestinal, and other cancers. No exposure to asbestos is without risk. Illnesses and deaths from asbestos exposure are entirely preventable. Conclusions All countries of the world have an obligation to their citizens to join in the international endeavor to ban the mining, manufacture, and use of all forms of asbestos. An international ban is urgently needed. There is no medical or scientific basis to exempt chrysotile from the worldwide ban of asbestos.
  • 关键词:asbestos; asbestos cancer pandemic; asbestos-related diseases; ban; cancer; chrysotile; controlled use; disinformation; mesothelioma; product defense
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有