摘要：Matthew Crawford compares his program of convivial craft-work toPolanyi’s fiduciary program. He argues that both are good ways of grapplingwith reality, and that both can help persons to focus their attentionin an age of distraction. Crawford criticizes the Enlightenment philosophersfor an overemphasis on the representations of things at the expenseof grappling with the real things. He argues that attention is a scarceresource, analogous to water. He sometimes uses language that can beinterpreted as expressing a belief in group minds.
