期刊名称：Agathos : an International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences
印刷版ISSN：2069-1025
电子版ISSN：2069-1025
出版年度：2017
卷号：8
期号：2
页码：7-16
出版社：Fundatia Culturala Poezia, Iasi
摘要：The study of the pathology of argumentation is correlated with the study of rational health, certified by the correctness of the logical operations, both being on the field of Logic. In this paper we propose to approach the logical errors from the point of view of argumentation as a concrete rational process of justification or rejection of an idea, in which, together with the strictly logical factor, give their best, the reference, the subjective intensity, the interlocutory factors, the enunciating factors; and the all in a complex process of communication. These key factors in argumentation can also represent some sources of error; and that is the reason for which we’ll use them as criteria for delimitating errors. The approach finishes in an integrating picture of argumentation errors, overcoming the disputes about the foundation of the division and the difficulty of framing different types of errors. This picture allows the systematization of all inventory errors over time and stimulates the identification of free places through the six essential points for argumentation.
关键词：argumentation; pathology; errors; reference points; pathology of argumentation
