首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月18日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:WHY AND WHAT IS INVESTIGATED IN SOCIAL SCIENCES? CONCEPTIONS OF RESEARCHERS IN TRAINING
  • 作者:Ana Bernal ; Javier Esparza ; María-José Ruiz
  • 期刊名称:Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology
  • 电子版ISSN:1696-2095
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:598-623
  • DOI:10.14204/ejrep.43/16098
  • 出版社:University of Almeria
  • 摘要:Introduction. This work tackles the question about the nature of creativity as a general vs.domain-specific ability. First we deal with the concept of creativity and then, the main approachesto the debate of generality vs. specificity are exposedMethod. A total of 133 students attending 3rd grade of secondary education in Murcia Regiontook part in this research. The assessment instruments were the Torrance Test of CreativeThinking to assess general-figurative creativity and the Hu and Adey's Scientific-Creativethinking test to meassure scienific creativity. Also the Diferencial Aptitude Test was used tomeassure intelligence. The relationship between figurative-general creativity and scientificcreativity was studied from diferent statistical procedures: using correlation analysis, factorial,and using perceptual mapping.Results. The results point out to the independence between both figurative and scientific creativity;further more, we could talk about a task-specific creativity.Discussion or Conclusion. The debate about the generality vs domain specific creativity doeshave a great effect on the educational practice. Specifically regarding two issuees: a) the typeof assessment to identify the students' creative potential, thus deciding which students couldbe candidates to enter specific gifted and talented programs; b) regarding to how to teach andfoster divergent thinking and creativity in our students.
  • 关键词:Specificity of creativity; Scientific creativity; Torrance test; Divergent thinking.
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有