首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月18日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Herb Leaves Recognition using Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix and Five Distance-based Similarity Measures
  • 其他标题:Herb Leaves Recognition using Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix and Five Distance-based Similarity Measures
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:R. Rizal Isnanto ; Munawar Agus Riyadi ; Muhammad Fahmi Awaj
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
  • 电子版ISSN:2088-8708
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:8
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:1920-1932
  • DOI:10.11591/ijece.v8i3.pp1920-1932
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES)
  • 摘要:Herb medicinal products derived from plants have long been considered as an alternative option for treating various diseases. In this paper, the feature extraction method used is Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), while for its recognition using the metric calculations of Chebyshev, Cityblock, Minkowski, Canberra, and Euclidean distances. The method of determining the GLCM Analysis based on the texture analysis resulting from the extraction of this feature is Angular Second Moment, Contrast, Inverse Different Moment, Entropy as well as its Correlation. The recognition system used 10 leaf test images with GLCM method and Canberra distance resulted in the highest accuracy of 92.00%. While the use of 20 and 30 test data resulted in a recognition rate of 50.67% and 60.00%.
  • 其他摘要:Herb medicinal products derived from plants have long been considered as an alternative option for treating various diseases. In this paper, the feature extraction method used is Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), while for its recognition using the metric calculations of Chebyshev, Cityblock, Minkowski, Canberra, and Euclidean distances. The method of determining the GLCM Analysis based on the texture analysis resulting from the extraction of this feature is Angular Second Moment, Contrast, Inverse Different Moment, Entropy as well as its Correlation. The recognition system used 10 leaf test images with GLCM method and Canberra distance resulted in the highest accuracy of 92.00%. While the use of 20 and 30 test data resulted in a recognition rate of 50.67% and 60.00%.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有