首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月15日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics: What are we assessing?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:James T. Laverty ; Marcos D. Caballero
  • 期刊名称:Physical Review ST Physics Education Research
  • 电子版ISSN:1554-9178
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:14
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-10
  • DOI:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010123
  • 出版社:American Physical Society
  • 摘要:Assessing student learning is a cornerstone of educational practice. Standardized assessments have played a significant role in the development of instruction, curricula, and educational spaces in college physics. However, the use of these assessments to evaluate student learning is only productive if they continue to align with our learning goals. Recently, there have been calls to elevate the process of science (“scientific practices”) to the same level of importance and emphasis as the concepts of physics (“core ideas” and “crosscutting concepts”). We use the recently developed Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol to investigate how well the most commonly used standardized assessments in introductory physics (i.e., concept inventories) align with this modern understanding of physics education’s learning goals. We find that many of the questions on concept inventories do elicit evidence of student understanding of core ideas, but do not have the potential to elicit evidence of scientific practices or crosscutting concepts. Furthermore, we find that the individual scientific practices and crosscutting concepts that are assessed using these tools are limited to a select few. We discuss the implications that these findings have on designing and testing curricula and instruction both in the past and for the future.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有