首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月27日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Are REDD+ community forest projects following the principles for collective action, as proposed by Ostrom?
  • 作者:Abdul-Razak Saeed ; Constance McDermott ; Emily Boyd
  • 期刊名称:International Journal of the Commons
  • 电子版ISSN:1875-0281
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:572-596
  • DOI:10.18352/ijc.700
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services
  • 其他摘要:Forested countries in the global south that have agreed to engage in REDD+, a policy mechanism for addressing climate change, are receiving support to improve laws, policies, systems and structures. As a mechanism initiated at the global level and seeking to use forests to address a global commons crisis (atmospheric carbon concentration), understanding how REDD+ translates into implementation at the local level is essential. Therefore, using a systematic review approach, we examined 15 studies of REDD+ in the context of public and/or community managed forests, drawn from a comprehensive application of inclusion criteria to identify relevant published peer-reviewed empirical research. The common property resources literature was used to highlight the role of local institutions in REDD+ and to distil how REDD+ community forest projects conform to Ostrom’s collective action principles. The review revealed limited sharing of information and decision-making authority with communities; a general absence of FPIC; and a lack of defined benefit sharing and conflict resolution arrangements in many of the REDD+ projects.
  • 关键词:climate change; collective action; forest; local communities; REDD+; systematic review
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有