文章基本信息

标题：Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after Refractive Surgery Provided by the ASCRS
作者：Jung, Soyeon ; Jung, Jiwon
期刊名称：Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
印刷版ISSN：0378-6471
出版年度：2018
卷号：59
期号：9
页码：827-833
DOI：10.3341/jkos.2018.59.9.827
语种：Korean
出版社：The Korean Ophthalmological Society
摘要：Purpose
Methods of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations for cataract surgery after myopic corneal refractive surgery were compared.
Methods
The medical records of 23 eyes from 20 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Five methods - Haigis L and Barrett no history method from Post-Refractive IOL Calculator of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), Shammas no history method, Haigis suite from IOL Master 700, and clinical history method - were used.
Results
The Barrette no history method from the ASCRS showed the lowest arithmetic errors, while the Haigis-L from the ASCRS showed the lowest absolute prediction errors (−0.38 ± 0.99 diopters [D] and 0.76 ± 0.68 D, respectively). The percentages of refractive prediction errors within 0.50 D and 1.00 D of the Barrett no history method were 52.2% and 82.6%, respectively.
Conclusions
The Barrette no history method and Haigis-L from the ASCRS showed the smallest errors in this study. The Barrett no history method showed a high percentage of refractive prediction errors within 0.50 D and 1.00 D.
关键词：American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) intraocular lens (IOL) calculator; Cataract; Corneal refractive surgery; IOL power calculation