首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Validity assumptions for a multiple-choice test of medical knowledge with open-books and web access. A known groups comparison study.
  • 作者:Lotte Dyhrberg O'Neill ; Eivind Ortind Simonsen ; Ulla Breth Knudsen
  • 期刊名称:Dansk Universitetspaedagogisk Tidsskrift
  • 印刷版ISSN:1901-5089
  • 电子版ISSN:2245-1374
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:25
  • 页码:134-150
  • 语种:Danish
  • 出版社:Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Netværk
  • 摘要:Relatively little evidence about the validity threats in open-book multiple-choice tests exist. The aim of this study was to examine validity aspects relating to gener-alization, extrapolation and decision of a multiple-choice test of medical knowledge with aids (open-book and internet access). The theoretical framework was modern validity theory, and the study was designed as a ‘known groups com-parison’ study. Test performances of three known groups of test takers hypothe-sized to have different knowledge levels of the test content were compared, and analysis of pass/fail decisions was used to examine implications of decisions based on test scores. Results indicated that it was possible to discriminate between expert and non-expert test taker groups even with the access to aids. In contrast, an inde-fensible passing score was found to be the largest potential threat to test validity. Relatively little evidence about the validity threats in open-book multiple-choice tests exist. The aim of this study was to examine validity aspects relating to gener-alization, extrapolation and decision of a multiple-choice test of medical knowledge with aids (open-book and internet access). The theoretical framework was modern validity theory, and the study was designed as a ‘known groups com-parison’ study. Test performances of three known groups of test takers hypothe-sized to have different knowledge levels of the test content were compared, and analysis of pass/fail decisions was used to examine implications of decisions based on test scores. Results indicated that it was possible to discriminate between expert and non-expert test taker groups even with the access to aids. In contrast, an inde-fensible passing score was found to be the largest potential threat to test validity.
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有